Dear Doug,

Thanks again for your reply. Based on that I did some further work.

I first demeaned the age of all subjects. Actually, I have a third group
which I would like to compare to, so my contrast matrices will be
[.5 .5 -.5 -.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 .5 .5 -.5 -.5 0 0 0 0 0 0]
[.5 .5 0 0 -.5 -.5 0 0 0 0 0 0]
to test for CT differences between all the groups while correcting for age
and sex. Surprisingly, I'm observing a big difference in the results
compared to the results without demeaning. Could you explain the reson for
this? In the FSGD-examples (eg
http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsgdFormat), age is also not
normalized. Does normalizing the variance to 1 also influence the results?
Given this big difference, I started wondering whether it would maybe be
better to analyze the data in pairs of two groups (and then demean by the
mean of the two groups). Would this be a better approach?

Concerning your second suggestion: if I test the data for differences in
group slope, a number of small area's are significantly different. Regions
popping up are especially in the neighborhood of the insula. Unfortunately
this suggests that I cannot use the DOSS model, or am I wrong?

Looking forward to your reply,
With best regards,
Martijn


On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Douglas Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:

>  Yes, that is correct, though I think your matrix should be [.5 .5 -.5 -.5
> 0 0 0 0]. You should also remove the mean from the age (mean computed from
> all subjects). Or even better, first test whether there is a group
> difference in age slope with [0 0 0 0 .5 .5 -.5 -.5]. If there is nothing
> that is significant, then re-run your analysis using the Different Offset
> Same Slope (DOSS) model with this contrast [.5 .5 -.5 -.5 0].
>
> doug
>
>
> On 12/10/11 4:15 AM, Martijn Steenwijk wrote:
>
>  Dear all,****
>
> ** **
>
> I’m relatively new with Freesurfer, but slowly getting more and more used
> to it’s great possibilities. To be ‘sure’, I’ve a question about the design
> of a GLM. ****
>
> ** **
>
> I want to compare CT in Healthy Controls vs Diseased, and control for age
> and sex. It appears to me that factors (eg sex) cannot be used as
> covariate/variable, which forces me to model them as a separate class
> although I’m not interested in sex differences. This brings me to the
> following FSGD file:****
>
> ** **
>
> # HcDis.fsgd****
>
> GroupDescriptorFile 1****
>
> Title HcDis****
>
> Class Hc_Male****
>
> Class Hc_Female****
>
> Class Dis_Male****
>
> Class Dis_Female****
>
> Variables Age****
>
> Input subjid1 Hc_Male 35****
>
> Input subjid2 Dis_Female 30****
>
> ….****
>
> ** **
>
> Then the difference between Hc and Dis, corrected for age and sex is given
> by the contrast matrix****
>
> #Hc-vs-Dis.mtx****
>
> 0.5 0.5 -0.5 -0.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ****
>
> ** **
>
> Is this correct? ****
>
> ** **
>
> Best,****
>
> Martijn****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing 
> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to