Hi Bruce and Richard,

Yes, as Richard pointed out, I just wanted to know the numbers for input
to Amdahl's law, if you have already something, to figure out the maximum
expected speedup using multiple processors/cores.

As for improvements of em_reg, I'll try to split each transform as well as
parallelize the energy evaluation.

Thank you for your comments.

Akio

(2012/07/04 5:21), R Edgar wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> 
> wrote:
>
>> I think that the theoretical ratio is much bigger than what you would be
>> able to achieve in practice. It's hard to compute exactly, but for example
>> for em_reg it should be the number of samples (which are processed
>> independently), so something on the order of 1000. For ca_reg it should be
>> bigger, but it's a bit more complicated as things aren't independent.
> I _hope_ that the OpenMP version of mri_em_reg doesn't just try
> parallelising the energy evaluation - it would be better to split each
> transform off as a separate work item for handling by the available
> threads (similar to what I did on the extra-fast GPU version). This
> keeps the individual pieces of work big, which is good for CPUs
>
> I think that what Akio's after are the numbers to plug into Amdahl's
> Law. I don't think that these are easy to work out for anything in
> Freesurfer. But you can put timers around the parallel sections, and
> see what speed up you get on those.
>
> HTH,
>
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to