Hi Gabriel, certainly they won't match as (a) they are different algorithms, and (b) they are different definitions of what is and is not included. Did you sum up things like fimbria and fornix in your subfield totals?
cheers Bruce On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Gabriel Gonzalez Escamilla wrote: > > Hello, > > after applying hippocampal subfield segmentation to our sample, we noted tha > t summation of hippocampal subfields (in mm3) differs considerably from hipp > ocampal volume (derived from aseg) in some of our subjects: > > case 1: 2592 mm3 (aseg hipp. volume) versus 2116 mm3 (summation of hipp. sub > fields) > > case 2: 4764 mm3 (aseg hipp. volume) versus 4002 mm3 (summation of hipp. sub > fields) > > case 3: 1914 mm3 (aseg hipp. volume) versus 2110 mm3 (summation of hipp. sub > fields) > > Please let me know why this is happening, and if this mismatching can be con > sidered normal. > > Thank you very much in advance. > > Best regards, > Gabriel > > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
