In the http://cerebralvol.com service we are having 23.5 hours average with
5.1 and 23.8 hours average with 5.2-Beta

Notice that in order to minimize the cost to the user we are running it in
m1.medium

We have achieved a full recon-all in less than 4 hours (3.83 hours) with
cg1.4xlarge

But for a large amount of data I believe our 1024-core m1.medium is the
best cost benefit.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Pedro Paulo de Magalhães Oliveira Junior
Netfilter & SpeedComm Telecom
-- www.netfilter.com.br
-- For mobile: http://itunes.apple.com/br/artist/netfilter/id365306441



On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 2:11 AM, Mehul Sampat <mpsam...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Bruce,
> No I did not specify the # of open mp threads on the recon-all cmd line.
> These run times were obtained by  running one subject per core. for example
>  cc2.8xlarge has 8 cores and so we ran 8 subjects at once;
> Thanks for the info about the # of open mp threads options; I will look
> into it.
>
> One other note: Bruce, Nick did you improve the memory management in 5.2 ?
> On our local machine we noticed we can run 6 subjects simultaneously even
> though we only have 12gb of ram.
> I thought some of the them might crash since we only have 2gb per subject
> but no crashes so far over 30 subjects..
> Mehul
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Bruce Fischl 
> <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>wrote:
>
>> Hi Mehul
>>
>> did you specify the # of open mp threads on the recon-all cmd line?
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013, Mehul Sampat wrote:
>>
>>  Hi Folks,
>>> Just wanted to share our experience with running FS 5.2-beta on Amazon
>>> Web
>>> Services (AWS).
>>> Basically, AWS has multiple instance types
>>> (http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/**instance-types/<http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/>)
>>> and we were trying to figure out
>>> the most cost-effective approach.
>>>
>>> We ran two subjects through FS 5.2-beta on M1 Large Instance (m1.large)
>>> and Cluster Compute Eight Extra Large Instance (cc2.8xlarge). (same
>>> subjects
>>> run on both instance). We expected cc2.8xlarge to be faster (but it is
>>> also
>>> more expensive: $2.4 per hour; 8 cores); The run-times we got:
>>>
>>> instance-type subject start-time end-time run-time
>>> m1.large subject-1 01:05:44 UTC 2013 15:40:45 UTC 2013 ~14hr-35mins
>>> m1.large subject-2 01:06:06 UTC 2013 15:08:45 UTC 2013 ~14hr-02mins
>>> cc2.8xlarge subject-1 01:26:38 UTC 2013 12:30:23 UTC 2013 ~11hr-04mins
>>> cc2.8xlarge subject-2 01:27:28 UTC 2013 12:19:08 UTC 2013 ~10hr-52mins
>>>
>>> Although m1.large is a few hours slower, it seems to be the more cost
>>> effective option since it is $0.24 per hour (2 cores). If you have run
>>> Freesurfer on AWS, do you have a similar experience ? Any suggestions to
>>> speed up the run-times on AWS would be very helpful.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Mehul
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
>> is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
>> e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
>> HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/**complianceline<http://www.partners.org/complianceline>.
>>  If the e-mail was sent to you in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
>> properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to