Thanks Nick! I have uploaded the relevant files to you. Thanks, Daniel
-- Yung-Jui "Daniel" Yang, PhD Postdoctoral Researcher Yale Child Study Center New Haven, CT (203) 737-5454 On 4/10/13 1:19 PM, "Nick Schmansky" <ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote: >Daniel, > >We're repeating our paired-analysis of thickness measures between 5.1 >and 5.2. In the meantime, to check for correctness, open the >brain.finalsurfs.mgz file with the surfaces overlayed, and check the >intensity value of the voxels which appear to be non-cortical 'black >spaces', relative to neighboring gm voxels. ignore the aseg.mgz gm >voxels, as those are not accurate (ie, dont load aseg.mgz when >inspecting surfaces, or at least turn if off when inspecting gm >regions....its still handy to see where hippocampus sits). > >Nick > > >On Wed, 2013-04-10 at 11:11 +0000, Yang, Daniel wrote: >> Dear FreeSurfer Experts and Users, >> >> Did anyone find similar things using FS 5.2 (please see my previous post >> below)? That is, FS 5.2 is including more non-cortical "black spaces" >> within pial surfaces, compared to FS 5.1? >> >> I'm not interested in nitpicking but I feel this is a rather serious >> issue, so I would like to raise it again before it's completely >>forgotten. >> >> At the meantime I keep receiving Emails from people asking me this >>issue. >> >> Thanks! >> Daniel >> > > > > >The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it >is >addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the >e-mail >contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance >HelpLine at >http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in >error >but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and >properly >dispose of the e-mail. _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
