Hi Marie,

But division by 5 would give the average area of the 5 mid slices. Maybe 
that is even more meaningful (reliable) than just a single slice.

Best, Martin

On 04/14/2013 09:05 AM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
> Hi Marie,
>
> no, that won't account for variability across slices in the l/r
> direction. Try rerunning mri_cc with -t 0 (thickness) and see if it
> generates a cc in just the midsagittal plane
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Marie Schaer wrote:
>
>> Hi Bruce,
>>
>> Thanks for your response. Then I assume that I can divide these values by 5
>> and present them as area of the CC on the midline section, right?
>>
>> Have a nice week-end,
>>
>> Marie
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2013, at 5:18 AM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>        Hi Marie
>> It is mm^3 of I believe a 5 mm thick cc. We don't measure the
>> thickness by default
>> Cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 13, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Marie Schaer <marie.sch...@unige.ch>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>        Hi Bruce,
>>
>>        Thanks for your response. My question was indeed: what is
>>        the unit of the CC_* output in the aseg.stats? E.g. in the
>>        attached file, the last 5 rows depict CC segmentation
>>        measurements (between ~400+ and 900+), and I was wondering
>>        what was the unit of these measurements. The other values
>>        are clearly mm^3, but what about the CC? From what I
>>        understood from Diana Rosas' paper, the CC was measured as
>>        the thickness / distance from the medial axis of the CC to
>>        the superior and inferior boundaries, but I may have
>>        wrongly understood.
>>
>>        Thanks for the clarification,
>>
>>        Marie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 12, 2013, at 8:07 PM, Bruce Fischl
>> <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marie,
>>> 400 or 900 what? Not mm. How are you calculating thickness? I
>> think in Diana's paper it was the radius of the inscribed circle
>> on the medial axis, wasn't it?
>>> Bruce
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 12, 2013, at 10:44 PM, Marie Schaer
>> <marie.sch...@unige.ch> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I have a quick question related to the corpus callosum
>> segmentation: I read in previous posts that the reference
>> explaining more about the CC subdivision in 5 segments was the
>> one by Rosas et al, Neuroimage 2010. But in this publication,
>> you show thickness of the corpus callosum as the main outcome
>> variable, with average values ranging from ~4 to 9 mm. And when
>> I extract the values from the aseg.stats, in my dataset I rather
>> get average values that are ranging between ~400 and 900
>> depending on the segment. Do these values correspond to
>> thickness in mm/100, or to area, or to something else? Is that a
>> thickness measurement, or a surface area measurement?
>>>> Many thanks in advance for your reply,
>>>>
>>>> Marie
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freesurfer mailing list
>>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
>> to whom it is
>>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
>> and the e-mail
>>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>> Compliance HelpLine at
>>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
>> sent to you in error
>>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>> sender and properly
>>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>>
>>        <aseg.stats>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>

-- 
Dr. Martin Reuter
Assistant in Neuroscience - Massachusetts General Hospital
Instructor in Neurology   - Harvard Medical School
MGH / HMS / MIT

A.A.Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
149 Thirteenth Street, Suite 2301
Charlestown, MA 02129

Phone: +1-617-724-5652
Email:
    mreu...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
    reu...@mit.edu
Web  : http://reuter.mit.edu

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to