Hi Susie - If you can label the connection that you want in trackvis consistently in a set of subjects, then yes, it'd be possible to create your own mini atlas. You'd have to map the .trk files with the trackvis streamlines and the aparc+aseg's from all the training subjects to either the MNI or the CVS template. Then there's a trainfile variable that you can set in the configuration file that tells trac-all where to find the training data. If you decide to go through with this, I can try to document it in more detail on the wiki.
a.y On Mon, 15 Apr 2013, Susan Kuo wrote:
Hi Anastasia, We were viewing the arcuate fasiculus tract created by TRACULA, and noticed that the tract did not reach Broca's area. While there exists literature that now challenges this neuroanatomical convention, I would like to investigate the possibility of creating and inputting on our own training subjects as priors. Do you know if we can try this? Thank you! -- Susie Kuo Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius. - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Sherlock Holmes- Valley of Fear
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
