Was this ever answered?

1. Units - Not sure what the units of MD are. It might depend on your 
b-value
2. MD is not constrained to be between 0 and 1. Where are you getting that?
3. I don't know about the CC values. The CC ROIs are pretty small, and 
you might be getting significant partial voluming

doug

On 06/06/2014 02:06 AM, Rotem Saar wrote:
> Dear freesurfer experts,
>
> I'm using freesurfer 5.3 for extracting FA and MD values for each 
> region from the *aseg file for each subject.
> While I get validated FA values (I validated them with you, the 
> literature and some other software I used), I have a problem getting 
> reasonable MD values.
>
> This is the script I'm using for extracting the MD values:
>
> 1) dt_recon --i 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI/I160.dcm --s 
> Anatomy0981 --o /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI --b 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI/bvals.bval 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI/bvecs.bvec
>
> 2) mri_label2vol --seg 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/mri/wmparc.mgz --temp 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/mri/wmparc.mgz --reg 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI/register.dat --o 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI/forMD.mgz
>
> 3) mri_segstats --seg-erode 1 --seg 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/mri/wmparc.mgz --ctab 
> $FREESURFER_HOME/FreeSurferColorLUT.txt --i 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/DTI/forMD.mgz --sum 
> /usr/local/freesurfer/subjects/Anatomy0981/stats/all_stats_MD-masked
>
> It writes *.txt files similar to the ones of the FA (and also the 
> volumetric analysis) which is good, but -
>
> 1) I can't understand the units (it is written "unknown"). can u tell 
> me what do these units refer to ?
> 2) I can't understand why the units I get don't corresponds to the 
> units in the literature (0-1). Is there a transformation I need to 
> apply to these units in order to get the values we all see in the 
> literature (MD values ranges between 0 to 1 in the papers I read).
> 3) I am concerned about the differences in the values both between and 
> within subjects. For example, see 3 different subjects and their MD 
> values for the corpus-callosum:
>
> subject 1:
>
>  35 251       368      368.0 CC_Posterior                       
> 7.4783     7.9938 0.0000    16.0000    16.0000
>  36 252       110      110.0 CC_Mid_Posterior                  
> 56.7273   476.3758 0.0000  5002.0000  5002.0000
>  37 253       205      205.0  CC_Central 992.4537  1806.8883     
> 0.0000  5002.0000  5002.0000
>  38 254       132      132.0  CC_Mid_Anterior 1664.2954  2328.8467    
> 43.0000  5002.0000  4959.0000
>  39 255       277      277.0  CC_Anterior 1723.4620  1914.7883     
> 0.0000  5002.0000  5002.0000
>
> subject 2:
>
>  36 251       328      328.0 CC_Posterior                       
> 0.0000     0.0000 0.0000     0.0000     0.0000
>  37 252        78       78.0 CC_Mid_Posterior                  
> 43.9744   226.6371 0.0000  2000.0000  2000.0000
>  38 253       100      100.0  CC_Central 203.0800   779.8602     
> 0.0000  5001.0000  5001.0000
>  39 254        83       83.0  CC_Mid_Anterior 264.5783   364.1581     
> 0.0000  1002.0000  1002.0000
>  40 255       321      321.0  CC_Anterior 985.8879   720.5300     
> 0.0000  3028.0000  3028.0000
>
> subject 3:
>
>  35 251       424      424.0 CC_Posterior                      
> 20.6840     6.6236 10.0000    60.0000    50.0000
>  36 252       160      160.0  CC_Mid_Posterior 143.4312   780.4187     
> 0.0000  5001.0000  5001.0000
>  37 253       202      202.0  CC_Central 538.0248  1143.9441     
> 0.0000  5001.0000  5001.0000
>  38 254       179      179.0  CC_Mid_Anterior 496.5140   623.4088     
> 0.0000  2023.0000  2023.0000
>  39 255       361      361.0  CC_Anterior 211.6094   539.0007     
> 0.0000  2028.0000  2028.0000
>
> the values are really different both within the CC parts of the same 
> subject (does this make any sense ??) and also between subjects...
>
> We ruled out a problem in the gradient matrix (both with you and 
> because the FA values corresponds to reasonable values both from the 
> literature and other software we use).
>
> Can u please advise on how can we solve this issue ? We are in the 
> middle of submission of a very novel study and were required to show 
> addition analysis of the MD values - this is why this is so impotent 
> to us. Attached please find the full *.txt files I got.
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Rotem Saar-Ashkenazy
>
> Department of Brain and Cognitive Science
> Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, 84105
>
> School of Social Work
> Ashkelon Academic College, Ashkelon, 78211
>
> Israel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

-- 
Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
MGH-NMR Center
gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Phone Number: 617-724-2358
Fax: 617-726-7422

Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to