Hi Greg,

Is this simply an image viewing problem or does the data actually need to
be re-processed? (I'm working with ~500 subjects, so I figured I would
check before taxing the servers I had access to).

Thanks much!

Best,
Jamie.




On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, <freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> Send Freesurfer mailing list submissions to
>         freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         freesurfer-requ...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         freesurfer-ow...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Freesurfer digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Surface Viewer Issue. (Gregory Kirk)
>    2. Re: Mismatched dimensions with T1 and Flair inputs        {Disarmed}
>       (Vilde)
>    3. Re: v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize bug (Marx, Gabe)
>    4. Re: v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize bug (Bruce Fischl)
>    5. Re: rawfunc2surf-sess with a limited set of surface files
>       (Douglas N Greve)
>    6. functional correlation (Brian Donley)
>    7. Re: rawfunc2surf-sess with a limited set of surface       files
>       (Reza Rajimehr)
>    8. mri_thickness & mri_make_surfaces (Seung-Goo KIM)
>    9. Re: WM & Pial Segmentation Errors (Varjabedian, Ani)
>   10. "deployed" (compiled) MATLAB scripts path manipulation
>       (sle...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu)
>   11. 8 spots remain in the FreeSurfer course (Allison Stevens)
>   12. excluding labels (Adam, Ruth)
>   13. FSGD Format Error (Retzepi, Kallirroi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 14:47:27 -0500
> From: Gregory Kirk <gk...@wisc.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Surface Viewer Issue.
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <76a0cbb215b316.54354...@wiscmail.wisc.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
>
> i saw this problem on one redhat installation, not on any others, seems
> something with the X library orientation
> information and openGL
>
> greg
>
> On 10/08/14, Jamie Hanson  wrote:
> > Hi Freesurfer List,
> >
> >
> > I had a (hopefully quick) question about surface viewers and data
> orientation in tksurfer v. freeview.
> >
> >
> > I processed all my data in freesurfer v5.3.0 (on a linux cluster) and
> noticed something odd when I viewed surfaces. For tksurfer, the surfaces
> were upside down when I opened them (see attached pic: tksurfer.png); for
> freeview, the data looked fine (see attached pic: freeview.png).
> >
> >
> > I believe the orientation of the images is correct (judging by the
> freeview axes), but wondered if this was something others had run into? I
> uploaded an example subject to the Martinos Center FileDrop (link:
> http://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2/?p=9491zcnivqw).
> >
> >
> > Any thoughts are greatly appreciated! Thanks much!
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Jamie.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jamie L. Hanson
> > Postdoctoral Fellow, Carolina Consortium on Human Development
> > Duke University
> > 417 Chapel Drive
> > Duke West Campus
> > Sociology-Psychology Building, Room 07A
> > Durham, NC 27710
> > Email: jamielarshan...@gmail.com
> > Website: http://jamiehanson.org/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 22:01:06 +0200
> From: Vilde <vildesk...@hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Mismatched dimensions with T1 and Flair
>         inputs  {Disarmed}
> To: <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <dub122-w3321c71b2bec2fa5d6be4cd2...@phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> I will try that.
>
> Have a good day!
>
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 14:07:38 -0400
> From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Mismatched dimensions with T1 and Flair inputs
>
> you would have to first run recon-all -all on the T1
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014,
> Vilde wrote:
>
> > Thank you Bruce!
> >
> > If I understand you correctly, would the command be
> >
> > Recon-all -s subj_name -FLAIRpial.nii ?
> >
> > Or would I first have to do recon-all with only T1 as input and then do
> > another command after it has finished running? And in that case, what
> would
> > that command be?
> >
> > Best,
> > Vilde
> >
> > Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:56:51 -0400
> > From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Mismatched dimensions with T1 and Flair inputs
> >
> > Hi Vilde
> >
> > no, you can't give recon-all a flair directly, it needs a  T1 do do the
> > recon on. You use the flair at the end to do a post-hoc deformation using
> > -flairpial I believe
> >
> > cheers
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Vilde wrote:
> >
> > > Dear mailing list,
> > > I am trying to do a recon-all with two nifti inputs: A T1 and a Flair,
> for
> > > pial surface refinement. This results in an error message saying the
> > > dimensions are mismatched. (The third dimension of the T1 and Flair are
> > > different by one slice. ) I do not, however, have a problem running
> > > recon-all with only one T1 input. I am using Freesurfer v 5.1 .
> > >
> > > I read in the release notes that in version 5.2 you can use the flag
> -FLAI
> > R
> > > when you are using a flair image as input. I suppose this will not run
> in
> > an
> > > earlier version?
> > > Would it be correct to use the following  command :
> > >
> > > recon-all -s [subject] -i T1.nii -i flair.nii -all
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Vilde
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The
> information
> > in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed.
> If
> > you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains
> > patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
> in
> > error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender
> > and properly dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20141008/7d22519d/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 21:02:34 +0000
> From: "Marx, Gabe" <gabe.m...@ucsf.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize bug
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <efc972bc4d7d0340a51a7b3a4dd397ccc68...@ex06.net.ucsf.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I appreciate the response!
>
> I am sorry, I am a bit confused. The release notes state:
>
> "An option is to disable the running of mri_ca_normalize when re-running
> the -autorecon2 or -autorecon2-cp stage after adding control points by
> adding the flag -nocanorm to the end of recon-all. We will continue to
> investigate a more automated solution to detection of this problem. The
> more permanent workaround for v5.1 users is to edit their recon-all script
> making the following change, which will disable usage of control points
> with ca_norm:
>
> # find these lines:
> set cmd = (mri_ca_normalize)
> if($UseControlPoints)  set cmd = ($cmd -f $ControlPointsFile)
>
> # and comment-out the second line like this:
> set cmd = (mri_ca_normalize)
> #if($UseControlPoints)  set cmd = ($cmd -f $ControlPointsFile)
>
> # then re-run your subjects with the flags: -autorecon2 -autorecon3
> -clean-aseg"
>
> Are you saying the -nocanorm flag will result in inaccurate data?
>
> Thanks!
> Gabe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
> Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 8:12 AM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize bug
>
> Hi Gabe
>
> this wasn't really a bug per-se, just induced some behavior that people
> didn't like. You can't skip the mri_ca_normalize step or the aseg won't be
> accurate. The aseg patch I believe just starts autorecon2-cp after the aseg
> hs been created, but Nick or Zeke can correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> cheers
> Bruce
>
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Marx, Gabe wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello Freesurfer experts,
> >
> > ?
> >
> > I had a question regarding the v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize
> > bug. I read the release notes and know that this bug can be worked
> > around by adding the ?nocanorm flag to my recon-all however I have
> > become worried about the ramifications of skipping mri_ca_normalize in
> my pipeline.
> > Would someone be able to give me a better description as to what
> > mri_ca_normalize is doing and what I am sacrificing by taking it out
> > of my pipeline? Furthermore, in regards to the patch for the recon-all
> > script to fix this bug, what is the patch doing exactly? ?If I had
> > some data in which I used the ?nocanorm flag and other data in which I
> > used the patch would I still be able to make valid analysis if I merged
> them?
> > Would there be significant inconsistencies?
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > ?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Gabe
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 17:05:41 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize bug
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Nick Schmansky <ni...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <alpine.lrh.2.03.1410081705140.27...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I don't think you want to run with -nocanorm. Just commenting out the
> addition of the  -f $ControlPointsFile should be sufficient. Right Nick?
> On
> Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Marx, Gabe wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > I appreciate the response!
> >
> > I am sorry, I am a bit confused. The release notes state:
> >
> > "An option is to disable the running of mri_ca_normalize when re-running
> the -autorecon2 or -autorecon2-cp stage after adding control points by
> adding the flag -nocanorm to the end of recon-all. We will continue to
> investigate a more automated solution to detection of this problem. The
> more permanent workaround for v5.1 users is to edit their recon-all script
> making the following change, which will disable usage of control points
> with ca_norm:
> >
> > # find these lines:
> > set cmd = (mri_ca_normalize)
> > if($UseControlPoints)  set cmd = ($cmd -f $ControlPointsFile)
> >
> > # and comment-out the second line like this:
> > set cmd = (mri_ca_normalize)
> > #if($UseControlPoints)  set cmd = ($cmd -f $ControlPointsFile)
> >
> > # then re-run your subjects with the flags: -autorecon2 -autorecon3
> -clean-aseg"
> >
> > Are you saying the -nocanorm flag will result in inaccurate data?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Gabe
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu [mailto:
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Bruce Fischl
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 8:12 AM
> > To: Freesurfer support list
> > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize bug
> >
> > Hi Gabe
> >
> > this wasn't really a bug per-se, just induced some behavior that people
> didn't like. You can't skip the mri_ca_normalize step or the aseg won't be
> accurate. The aseg patch I believe just starts autorecon2-cp after the aseg
> hs been created, but Nick or Zeke can correct me if I'm wrong.
> >
> > cheers
> > Bruce
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Marx, Gabe wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Hello Freesurfer experts,
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> I had a question regarding the v5.1 control point mri_ca_normalize
> >> bug. I read the release notes and know that this bug can be worked
> >> around by adding the ?nocanorm flag to my recon-all however I have
> >> become worried about the ramifications of skipping mri_ca_normalize in
> my pipeline.
> >> Would someone be able to give me a better description as to what
> >> mri_ca_normalize is doing and what I am sacrificing by taking it out
> >> of my pipeline? Furthermore, in regards to the patch for the recon-all
> >> script to fix this bug, what is the patch doing exactly? ?If I had
> >> some data in which I used the ?nocanorm flag and other data in which I
> >> used the patch would I still be able to make valid analysis if I merged
> them?
> >> Would there be significant inconsistencies?
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >>
> >> ?
> >>
> >> Best,
> >>
> >> Gabe
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:38:16 -0400
> From: Douglas N Greve <gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] rawfunc2surf-sess with a limited set of
>         surface files
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <5435aec8.3020...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>
> Try it without -i fmc
>
>
> On 10/08/2014 04:38 AM, Reza Rajimehr wrote:
> > One more question:
> >
> > I tried to run:
> >
> > rawfunc2surf-sess -s oz_fparc -i fmc -trgsubject F99 -surfreg
> > iter05.sphere.reg -fwhm 2 -per-session
> >
> > And I got this:
> >
> > ERROR: experts key needed (-expkey)
> >
> > Not sure what this flag is.
> >
> > Reza
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
>
> --
> Douglas N. Greve, Ph.D.
> MGH-NMR Center
> gr...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Phone Number: 617-724-2358
> Fax: 617-726-7422
>
> Bugs: surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/BugReporting
> FileDrop: https://gate.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/filedrop2
> www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/facility/filedrop/index.html
> Outgoing: ftp://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/transfer/outgoing/flat/greve/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 16:48:11 -0500
> From: Brian Donley <brian.don...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] functional correlation
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID:
>         <CAJO=T5tRjhKMPMJh_PuHKDBv=
> f0lagpv69so58kyenmcium...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello Freesurfers
>
> A bit new to the program, so I hope the following makes sense. We would
> like to do a bottom-up vertex-by-vertex analysis to see where functional
> activation correlates with thickness. We've done our functional analyses
> through SPM and can get those maps into tksurfer. Most of the tutorials and
> information I see has to do with, for example, defining a ROI based on
> functional data and extracting the thickness measures "under" that ROI. But
> this would be a little different
>
> Does this make sense, and is this doable in freesurfer? If so, could
> someone point me to the relevant tutorial or commands?
>
> I appreciate your help
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20141008/9ecbc2cf/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:12:04 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Reza Rajimehr" <r...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] rawfunc2surf-sess with a limited set of
>         surface files
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID:
>         <42178.18.93.15.69.1412827924.squir...@mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Removing -i fmc did not help, and I still get the same error.
>
> By looking at the rawfunc2surf-sess script, it looks like specifying an
> argument for -surfreg makes ExpKeyNeeded = 1. Can I just specify something
> for -expkey? Is this something that is used only in the name of log file?
>
> Thanks,
> Reza
>
>
> Try it without -i fmc
>
>
> On 10/08/2014 04:38 AM, Reza Rajimehr wrote:
> > One more question:
> >
> > I tried to run:
> >
> > rawfunc2surf-sess -s oz_fparc -i fmc -trgsubject F99 -surfreg
> > iter05.sphere.reg -fwhm 2 -per-session
> >
> > And I got this:
> >
> > ERROR: experts key needed (-expkey)
> >
> > Not sure what this flag is.
> >
> > Reza
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 12:42:07 +0200
> From: Seung-Goo KIM <sol...@gmail.com>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] mri_thickness & mri_make_surfaces
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <4e85c9bd-03cd-4781-a989-432d9eaf7...@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>
> Hi all,
>
> I?m trying to compute cortical thickness using mris_thickness (stable 5),
> but getting slightly different results from the recon-all 5.1.0-amd64-2.13
> (mri_make_surfaces, stable 5).
>
> Hinted from an old thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg05994.html,
> I set the switch ?-N 20", but it returns  different values: 50% of vertices
> have identical values with the cross-correlation of about 0.98 and RMS of
> 0.08 mm, which is of course very high, but a bit odd while I was expecting
> nearly identical results. When I checked the scatter plots, the
> mris_thickness returns a bit smaller values for many vertices than the
> standard result. Is this somewhat expected difference between
> mri_make_surfaces and mris_thickness?
>
> Also I found that mri_thickness reads ??h.gray?, not ??h.pial?. As I
> assumed that it reads ??h.pial? and ??h.white? to compute thickness, so I
> just linked ??h.pial? to ??h.gray?.  Is this assumed input for
> mris_thickness?
>
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Seung-Goo KIM
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20141009/fdd67cc0/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 14:01:55 +0000
> From: "Varjabedian, Ani" <avarjabed...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] WM & Pial Segmentation Errors
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <1412863314.22885.45.ca...@sangwoo.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I took a look at your data and it seems that you paired a T2 image with
> a T1 image when you submitted to recon all. Recon-all will try to
> average these together, and since they have such different contrasts,
> you will end up with a poor template for surfaces later on.
>
> Try running recon-all again without the T2 and see if that helps.
>
>
> -Ani
>
>
> On Wed, 2014-10-08 at 17:21 +0000, Smith, Michael wrote:
> > Ah, sorry for some reason it just wasn?t clicking before.  I was able to
> > upload a dataset.  Thanks!
> >
> > On 10/8/14, 10:59 AM, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> >
> > >Hi Michael
> > >
> > >you need to follow the directions on this page:
> > >
> > >http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FtpFileExchange
> > >
> > >in particular, make sure you change directories before trying to put
> > >
> > >cheers
> > >Bruce
> > >
> > >On Wed,
> > >8 Oct 2014,
> > >Smith,
> > >Michael wrote:
> > >
> > >> See attached
> > >>
> > >> On 10/8/14, 10:46 AM, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> can you send us the details of your ftp command?
> > >>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014, Smith,
> > >>> Michael wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Bruce,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Do I not have permission to transfer files to the remote machine? I
> > >>>>can
> > >>>> login fine as an anonymous user but when I attempt to use the put
> > >>>> command
> > >>>> it says it could not create the file.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 10/7/14, 7:33 PM, "Bruce Fischl" <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> > >>>>wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Hi Michael
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> sure, the T2 can help if you have it (although you'll need to
> > >>>>>download
> > >>>>> some
> > >>>>> updated binaries), but it is impossible to tell from these images
> > >>>>>what
> > >>>>> is
> > >>>>> going on. Looks either the intensity normalization, mri_segment or
> > >>>>> mris_make_surfaces failed. You can try the expert options for each
> > >>>>>one
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>> prespecify the range of allowable intensities for gray and white
> > >>>>> matter.
> > >>>>> If
> > >>>>> you upload the subject to our ftp site (the whole subject directory
> > >>>>> tarred
> > >>>>> and gzipped) we will take a look
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> cheers
> > >>>>> Bruce
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Mon, 6 Oct 2014, Smith, Michael wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hi,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I?ve been having trouble on a few of our subjects with getting the
> > >>>>>> white
> > >>>>>> matter and pial surface files to ?line up? correctly with the
> volume
> > >>>>>> files.
> > >>>>>>  I?ve attached a screenshot of what is happening: the pial surface
> > >>>>>>is
> > >>>>>> in red
> > >>>>>> and the white matter surface file is in yellow. I have also
> attached
> > >>>>>> an
> > >>>>>> example of a ?good? subject for comparison.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I?ve tried looking through the tutorials online but didn?t see
> > >>>>>> anything
> > >>>>>> that
> > >>>>>> was really related to my issue and I was wondering what the best
> way
> > >>>>>> to
> > >>>>>> correct this.  We have T2 weighted images for several subjects is
> > >>>>>>well
> > >>>>>> if
> > >>>>>> that helps.  Not sure if Freesurfer can use T2 images instead of
> T1
> > >>>>>>in
> > >>>>>> the
> > >>>>>> ?reconall script but I thought I would mention it.  Thank you very
> > >>>>>> much
> > >>>>>> in
> > >>>>>> advance!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Michael S.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> Freesurfer mailing list
> > >>>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > >>>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:08:10 -0400 (EDT)
> From: sle...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Subject: [Freesurfer] "deployed" (compiled) MATLAB scripts path
>         manipulation
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Cc: martinos-t...@yahoogroups.com
> Message-ID:
>         <57088.172.21.16.53.1412867290.squir...@mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
>
> I have been following the directions on this site to "deploy" (compile) my
> MATLAB script so as to be able to run it on launchpad without worrying
> about MATLAB licenses.
>
> https://nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/martinos/itgroup/deploytool.html
>
> They say that the deployed script cannot do path manipulations such as
> addpath() or path(path,xxx), so the script should use isdeployed to make
> sure that such path commands are only executed if isdeployed == 0.
>
>
> % Only add path if not deployed
> if isdeployed==0;
>   addpath ~nummenma/matlab/work/connectome/HCP_preproc_tools;
> end
>
> but then I need to add the path back in again so it can access the
> functions on that path. In the deploytool GUI I click Settings (the little
> gear icon), and in the upper window "Additional Parameters passed to MCC:"
> I inserted
>
> ======[ Additional Parameters passed to MCC: ]======
> -I ~nummenma/matlab/work/connectome/HCP_preproc_tools
> mris_gradient_nonlin__unwarp_volume__batchmode_HCPS.m
> ====================================================
>
> (A web site I found said you need a path to the m-file itself, not just to
> the directory that contains it, and you separate the path and file)
>
> Then I found I had to circumvent more path(path,xxx) commands in my
> startup.m file too
>
> ======[ startup.m ]======
> % If script is not deployed add paths
> if isdeployed==0;
>   %------------ FreeSurfer -----------------------------%
>   fshome = getenv('FREESURFER_HOME');
>   fsmatlab = sprintf('%s/matlab',fshome);
>   if (exist(fsmatlab) == 7)
>       path(path,fsmatlab);
>   end
>   clear fshome fsmatlab;
>   %-----------------------------------------------------%
>
>   %------------ FreeSurfer FAST ------------------------%
>   fsfasthome = getenv('FSFAST_HOME');
>   fsfasttoolbox = sprintf('%s/toolbox',fsfasthome);
>   if (exist(fsfasttoolbox) == 7)
>       path(path,fsfasttoolbox);
>   end
>   clear fsfasthome fsfasttoolbox;
>   %-----------------------------------------------------%
> end
> =========================
>
> Now at least it compiles without error. But when I run it I get this:
>
> Set up FreeSurfer environment
> -------- freesurfer-Linux-centos6_x86_64-stable-v5.3.0-20130514 --------
> Setting up environment for FreeSurfer/FS-FAST (and FSL)
> FREESURFER_HOME   /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0
> FSFAST_HOME       /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/fsfast
> FSF_OUTPUT_FORMAT nii.gz
> SUBJECTS_DIR      /space/ficus/4/users/SNEF_subjects
> MNI_DIR           /usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/mni
> FSL_DIR           /usr/pubsw/packages/fsl/current
> ./run_unwarpone.sh
>         /cluster/matlab/8.2
>
> /space/ficus/4/users/SLOTS_sessions_Step/SLOTS010/aahscout/001/001.mgz
>
> /space/ficus/4/users/SLOTS_sessions_unwarp/SLOTS010/aahscout/001/001.mgz
>
> /space/ficus/4/users/SLOTS_sessions_Step/SLOTS010/unwarpscout001.log
> ------------------------------------------
> Setting up environment variables
> ---
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is
>
> .:/cluster/matlab/8.2/runtime/glnxa64:/cluster/matlab/8.2/bin/glnxa64:/cluster/matlab/8.2/sys/os/glnxa64
> The file
>    '/usr/local/freesurfer/stable5_3_0/matlab/load_nifti.m'
>    is not in the application's expanded CTF archive at
>     '/homes/6/slehar/.mcrCache8.2/unwarp2'.
> This is typically caused by calls to ADDPATH in your startup.m or
> matlabrc.m files. Please see the compiler documentation and use the
> ISDEPLOYED function to ensure ADDPATH commands are not executed by
> deployed applications.
> An error occurred while trying to determine whether "load_nifti" is a
> function name.
>
> MATLAB:err_while_looking_up_function
> Error:An error occurred while trying to determine whether "load_nifti" is
> a function name.
> Error:Error in mclFreeStackTrace.
>
> Any idea what the problem is now? load_nifti is presumably a FreeSurfer
> function -- do I now have a problem with my paths to FreeSurfer? I
> searched my script code and found no explicit call to "load_nifti", I
> presume that is called deep inside some other function. Should I add the
> FreeSurfer paths also through the deploytool GUI and not call "nmrenv"?
>
> (from my .cshrc file...
> alias nmrenv 'source /usr/local/freesurfer/nmr-stable53-env'
> )
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 11:27:07 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Allison Stevens <astev...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] 8 spots remain in the FreeSurfer course
> To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> Message-ID: <alpine.lrh.2.03.1410091122430.43...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
>
> Hello everyone,
> We have 8 spots remaining in our upcoming FreeSurfer course happening on
> October 27-29. We will accept late registrations up to the course date;
> however, since the payment deadline has passed, payment is due immediately
> upon registration.
>
> Details on the course and a link to the registration page can be found
> here:
> https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/CourseDescription
>
> Note: This course is the only one where we are currently able to accept
> credit card. This likely won't be an option for future courses.
> Allison
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 17:35:52 +0200
> From: "Adam, Ruth" <ruth.a...@med.uni-muenchen.de>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] excluding labels
> To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <4e8bff03-4a73-4634-a54f-c3759cdf5...@med.uni-muenchen.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20141009/18592f2b/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2014 15:55:35 +0000
> From: "Retzepi, Kallirroi" <kretz...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> Subject: [Freesurfer] FSGD Format Error
> To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu" <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> Message-ID: <63e2c9a6-fd10-4ee9-a13b-c1d731c6c...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi all,
> I have been struggling with my .fsgd file. Its header is the following (a
> total of 119 subjects):
>
> GroupDescriptorFile    1
> Title    Patients_vs_Controls
> MeasurementName    thickness
> Class    PxMale
> Class    PxFemale
> Class    ConMale
> Class    ConFemale
> Class    PxMPRAGE
> Class    PxSPGR
> Class    ConMPRAGE
> Class    ConSPGR
> Class    MaleMPRAGE
> Class    MaleSPGR
> Class    FemaleMPRAGE
> Class    FemaleSPGR
> Variables    Age
> Input    FS_1    PxFemale    PxMPRAGE    FemaleMPRAGE    51
> ..............(rest of subjects)
>
>
> I think something is up with my Class declaration, since the error message
> I get is the following:
>
> ERROR: gdfReadV1: Input line 1, subjid = FS_1
>        Found 3 variables, expected. 1
> FSGDF Format Error: file = /group_stats/Px_vs_Con_A.fsgd, tag=Input
>
>
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
>
> Thank you!
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/pipermail/freesurfer/attachments/20141009/92cd5c45/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> End of Freesurfer Digest, Vol 128, Issue 11
> *******************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to