Hi Andre
it's up to you. The aparc and .aparc.DKTatlas40 are probably pretty
similar, although we haven't looked at the .aparc.DKTatlas40 much. The
aparc.a2009s contains more, smaller parcels, and so is probably less
reliable but might correspond more closely to an anatomical hypothesis you
have.
cheers
Bruce
On Sun, 9 Aug 2015, Son, Andre wrote:
Hello,
What is the difference b/w the data generated in .aparc vs
.aparc.DKTatlas40. vs. aparc.a2009s?
Which data should I be using for studies on cortical thickness?
Thank you,
AS
------------------------------------------------------------
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you
have received this email in error please notify the sender by return email
and delete the original message. Please note, the recipient should check
this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The organization
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this
email.
=================================
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
