yes, we are hoping to get it out soon. It has been a ton of work and
feels neverending but it does seem to (finally!) be asymptoting.
Bruce
On Fri, 7
Oct 2016, Damien MARIE wrote:
Hi,
Many thanks to all for your replies.
What do you mean by waiting Bruce, the version 6.0 could be soon released?
Thank you and best,
Cheers,
Damien
Bruce Fischl Thu, 06 Oct 2016 07:11:04 -0700
Hi Damein
6.0 beta will handle this *much* better if you can wait.
cheers
Bruce
On 6 Oct 2016, at 15:46, Falk Lüsebrink
<falk.luesebr...@ovgu.de> wrote:
Hi Damien,
depending on what you want to do you are forced to use the stable
release. The developmental version of FreeSurfer should be used for
testing only, not publishing results.
Following the notes of the HiResRecon
(https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/HiResRecon) you should be
able to process your data with version 5.1 and above at native
resolution. However, this affects the surfaces based processing only
as the aseg.mgz is simply upsampled from previously downsampled data.
There are also a few methods to make use of the native resolution
which I haven't tested in recent past, e.g. using the surface of the
downsampled data on the native data. Otherwise you will have to
downsample you data to 1mm using v5.3.
Version 6 will be able to handle high resolution data at native
resolution using the -hires flag, making the workaround of the
HiResRecon obsolete. Having tested the developmental version (from mid
September) on several high resolution 7T datasets it seems to work
nicely and is less laborious than before. I haven't compared results
between v5.3 and v6 though.
Best,
Falk
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] Im Auftrag von Damien
MARIE
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Oktober 2016 14:01
An: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
Betreff: [Freesurfer] Processing 7T data
Dear experts,
I plan to process some MRI 7T data, 0.6 mm^3 isotropic voxel size. The
aim is to look a R1 maps.
I was wondering what was your opinion concerning the downsampling to 1
mm^3 (performed by the current FreeSurfer version if I am correct).
What do you think would be the best: FreeSurfer 5.3 , FreeSurfer
5.3-HCP or FreeSurfer beta 6.0?
Thank You and Best,
Damien
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the
Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline
. If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient
information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the
e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
