Hi Doug, This is my main objective.
1. PET in Group 1 vs Group 2 2. Thickness in the same sample, Group 1 vs Group 2 3. ASL in the same sample of Group 1 vs Group 2 4. Create a binary mask of the overlapping corrected sig voxels from 1-3. 5. This mask is therefore a site of co-localised atrophy, perfusion and PET changes in Group wrt Group 2. Now, I would like to look at how the effect sizes of 1-3 compare against one another, above and beyond the spatial overlap. I hope this is clearer, but let me know if I could provide more information. I thought about looking at *Z-scores* like some other studies, but I find that it is highly dependent on the range of the SD, which differed to a large extent (PET having a range of 1-10 vs 1-3 in atrophy). Hence I thought the Cohen's *D *might represent a more plausible workaround by pooling the SD across both groups, Thanks. Best Wishes, Elijah
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
