Thanks a lot, Bruce.

Cheers,
Zhivago...

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Zhivago
>
> tksurfer is deprecated and uses one of the methods available in
> mri_vol2surf, so our advice would be to use vol2surf
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2017, Zhivago wrote:
>
> [cleardot.gif]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> From whatever I read, there seem to be 2 ways for overlaying activation
>> maps
>> on surfaces.
>>
>> 1) automatic/manual registration of activation volume to orig.mgz and
>> usage
>> of mri_vol2surf to create the overlay, say ?h.sig.mgh, which can then be
>> overlaid on an inflated surface in freeview or tksurfer using the
>> register.dat.
>>
>> 2) automatic/manual registration of activation volume to orig.mgz and
>> overlay the activation volume on the inflated surface in tksurfer using
>> the
>> register.dat
>>
>> I want to know if both these are valid methods and if so, what are the
>> pros
>> and cons of each.  Seems like mri_vol2surf lets us decide what part of the
>> volume should be projected on the surface using the projfac arguments.
>> But
>> the direct volume overlay in tksurfer doesn't provide that option.  In
>> that
>> case what part of the volume is projected on to the surface?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Zhivago...
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Zhivago <zhiva...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>       Thanks Bruce!  Appreciate all the help,
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Fischl
>> <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
>>       1) This is up to you. Jon Polimeni had a nice paper
>>       describing the trade-off between accurately representing
>>       the local neural response (which is best at the white
>>       border) and statistical power (which is best nearer the
>>       pial surface).
>>
>>       2) This is also up to you.Read the help in mri_vol2surf.
>>       e.g.:
>>
>>       mri_vol2surf --help
>>       .
>>       .
>>       .
>>          --projfrac-avg min max del : average along normal
>>
>>       3) it is the way that we support.
>>
>>       cheers
>>       Bruce
>>
>>
>>       On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Zhivago wrote:
>>
>>             Hey Bruce,
>>
>>             Thank you very much for the responses!  Had
>>             posted a couple of more
>>             questions, but looks like it hasn't gone
>>             across.  Will really appreciate it
>>             if you can provide some answers to these.
>>
>>             1) The mri_vol2surf is used to project the
>>             activations from the GM onto an
>>             inflated surface, which is usually the
>>             inflated smoothwm surface output from
>>             reconall.  Will it be more accurate to use the
>>             inflated version of the
>>             intermediate surface, like halfway between the
>>             white and pial matter?  Will
>>             it make any kind of sense?
>>
>>             2) When mri_vol2surf projects a volume to a
>>             surface, does it average the
>>             activation values of voxels along the cortical
>>             depth or sum it?  What really
>>             happens beneath?  Any amount of insight will
>>             be helpful.
>>
>>             3) Is mri_vol2surf the only way to view
>>             activation maps on inflated surfaces
>>             or any surface?
>>
>>             Cheers,
>>             Zhivago...
>>
>>             On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 9:23 PM, Bruce Fischl
>>             <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>             wrote:
>>                   Hi Zhivago
>>
>>                   1) You can project from inside the
>>             ?h.white surface if
>>                   projfrac<0 and outside pial if
>>             projfrac>1. <<0 and >>1 won't
>>                   make much sense though as it starts to
>>             get arbitrary.
>>
>>                   2) The default projfrac, as documented
>>             in the -help response, is
>>                   0.
>>
>>                   3) Yes, 0-->white matter boundary. 1-->
>>             pial boundary.
>>
>>                   4) The .mgh/.mgz file create by vol2surf
>>             is an nvertices x 1 x 1
>>                   vector, which is a scalar field over the
>>             surface.
>>
>>                   cheers
>>                   Bruce
>>
>>
>>
>>                   On Sun, 15 Jan 2017, Zhivago wrote:
>>
>>                         Hi,
>>
>>
>>                         I do not have a good understanding
>>             of the
>>                         mri_vol2surf command.
>>
>>                         1) Can this only project the part
>>             of the volume that
>>                         lies between the white
>>                         & pial matter?
>>                         2) What is the default projection
>>             parameter that it
>>                         uses?
>>                         3) Does projection always start
>>             from the white
>>                         matter, i.e. is 0 the white
>>                         matter surface?
>>                         4) What is the nature of the mgh
>>             file that is
>>                         created by:
>>                         mri_vol2surf --src
>>             mri/spmT_0002.img --regheader
>>                         s04  --interp nearest
>>                         --hemi lh --o lh.sig.mgh
>>
>>                         Thanks,
>>                         Zhivago...
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             Freesurfer mailing list
>>             Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>>             https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>             The information in this e-mail is intended
>>             only for the person to whom
>>             it is
>>             addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent
>>             to you in error and the
>>             e-mail
>>             contains patient information, please contact
>>             the Partners Compliance
>>             HelpLine at
>>             http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If
>>             the e-mail was sent to you
>>             in error
>>             but does not contain patient information,
>>             please contact the sender
>>             and properly
>>             dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person
>> to whom it is
>> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error
>> and the e-mail
>> contains patient information, please contact the Partners
>> Compliance HelpLine at
>> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent
>> to you in error
>> but does not contain patient information, please contact the
>> sender and properly
>> dispose of the e-mail.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to