Dear Chris, I have found that -n 15 is for our 0.7x0.7x0.7mm3 data not enough.
I determined optimal value -n 30, empirically, by looking at the shape of inflated surface with various number of iterations. Over -n 30 there was almost no further progression in inflation. I suppose that better more than less. But maybe experts can correct me or provide better suggestion. Antonin Hi all, If I'm reading this < https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/SubmillimeterRecon> correctly, the current best practice for `-hires` is to include an expert file containing "mris_inflate -n 15", and that this should work for all voxel sizes (0.75mm)^3 - (1mm)^3? Or do we need to empirically determine the best value for a given voxel size, and if so, what should be the criteria for making this determination?Thanks, Chris Markiewicz
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
