In writing a paper of longitudinal changes in a large heterogeneous population with no group comparisons, what would be considered "more important" to include: absolute ROI volumes, or volumes corrected for ICV?
Using ICV corrected volumes makes sense when comparing groups, but when just describing population changes over time, for example a cross section of a population over a lifespan, is it better to use absolute volumes, corrected volumes, or both?
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
