Hi Kevin,
Thanks for the suggestion, but I don't think control points would help in this
situation. The region of white matter being excluded has been been correctly
normalized to approximately 110 and is included in the wm.mgz.
Thanks,
Matt
________________________________
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu] on behalf of Kevin Aquino
[aqu...@physics.usyd.edu.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 10:50 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 7T recon {Disarmed}
Does adding control points help?
https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/ControlPoints_freeview
Cheers,
Dr Kevin Aquino
Research fellow,
Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance Center, The University of Nottingham.
Honorary Research Fellow
School of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney
E kevin.aqu...@nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:kevin.aqu...@nottingham.ac.uk>,
aqu...@physics.usyd.edu.au<mailto:aqu...@physics.usyd.edu.au> | W MailScanner
has detected a possible fraud attempt from "www.physics.usyd.edu.au" claiming
to be https://kevinaquino.github.io<http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~aquino/>
----------------------------------------------
The brain is a wonderful organ. It starts working the moment you get up and
does not stop until you get into the office.
-
Robert Frost
CRICOS 00026A
This email plus any attachments to it are confidential. Any unauthorised use is
strictly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please delete it and
any attachments.
Please think of our environment and only print this e-mail if necessary.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Hibert, Matthew Louis
<mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu>> wrote:
Hi Bruce,
I edited the wm.mgz with the recon-editing tool this time, removing the problem
areas near this defect (primarily lots of dura originally included), and
confirmed that my edits remained after re-processing. However, the left STG is
still being removed, images attached (red is the lh.orig.nofix with
lh.defect_labels overlayed, yellow is lh.white). The entire left STG is still
being marked as a defect despite my edits. Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Matt
________________________________________
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
on behalf of Hibert, Matthew Louis
[mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:mhib...@mgh.harvard.edu>]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 5:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 7T recon
Ah ok, thanks Bruce.
Matt
________________________________________
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
[freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
on behalf of Bruce Fischl
[fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2017 4:35 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 7T recon
Hi Matt
we keep track of edits by setting erased voxels to 1, not 0. If you do
the editing within freeview using the "recon edit" tool, this will happen
automatically
cheers
Bruce
On Tue, 6 Jun 2017, Hibert, Matthew Louis wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
> Thanks again for your help so far. I've tried removing the problem voxels
> from the wm.mgz (setting their value to 0), saving the wm.mgz, and then
> running "recon-all -autorecon2-wm -autorecon3 -hires -s $SUBJECT -xopts-use
> -openmp 2". However, the edits to the wm.mgz are not incorporated and the
> surfaces are not changed; when I open the wm.mgz again, the voxels I removed
> are now present again. What am I doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
> ________________________________________
> From:
> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>
> [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
> on behalf of Bruce Fischl
> [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:57 PM
> To: Freesurfer support list
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 7T recon
>
> yes, and autorecon3
> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Hibert, Matthew Louis wrote:
>
>> Thanks Bruce. After I remove the problem voxels in wm.mgz, do I then re-run
>> the recon from autorecon2-wm?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Matt
>> ________________________________________
>> From:
>> freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>>
>> [freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
>> on behalf of Bruce Fischl
>> [fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>]
>> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2017 1:40 PM
>> To: Freesurfer support list
>> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] 7T recon
>>
>> Hi Matt
>>
>> yes, that means there was a topological defect that was incorrectly
>> fixed. If you load the wm.mgz over the lh.orig.nofix, then in the
>> orig.nofix load the file defect_labels as an overlay and change the overlay
>> settings to that the min is 1 and click the "use overlay color" button it
>> will show you the regions of the surface that are defective. You will then
>> need to edit the wm.mgz to remove the handle/hole that is the defect.
>>
>> cheers
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 26 May 2017, Hibert, Matthew Louis wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>> I reconstructed 20 subjects with a 750um isotropic MPRAGE collected at 7T
>>> and while most look good, 4 of the subjects have a similar section of the
>>> left STG removed from the final surfaces (picture attached). In all 4
>>> subjects the entire left STG is included in the wm.mgz and lh.orig.nofix
>>> (red), but a portion has been removed in lh.orig (yellow), so the problem
>>> seems to occur in the -fix stage of autorecon2.
>>>
>>> How can I go about correcting this issue?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
