no, I don't think so. There is some randomness in the algorithm (e.g.
sampling paths through the volume), but I thought we used the same random
seed each time to ensure repeatability. Was it on the same machine? What
was your command line? And How big were the differences?
On Tue, 5
Sep 2017, Phoolan Devi wrote:
I mean the hippocampal volume in the aseg... so, it's not normal?
Bruce Fischl Sat, 26 Aug 2017 11:24:44 -0700
do you mean the hippocampal volume in the aseg or in the subfields?
On Sat, 26 Aug 2017, anonymous anonymous wrote:
Hi all,
Without noticing I run recon-all twice on the same scan of the same subject and
we noticed there are
some differences, at least in the hippocampal volume estimation.
Is it normal? If it is, why is it so?
Thank you so much for your help
This is a great community!
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
