Hi experts! We are doing some QA exams with one subject scanned on different 3T scanners (with comparable/nearly identical imaging parameters). Afterwards, we looked into aseg values to compare them with the standard recon-all procedure. And we came across a strange result. Between two scanners the raw volumes are roughly the same, but the eICV's differ a lot (almost 30%). We looked into the data and found that even the mask volumes are alike (they differ less than 5% between the machines). the only outlier value is the eICV of one of the scanners. As this value is estimated, can this be a marker of some difficulties in normalization to Talairach upon the data of the scanner? Should it be alarming when an eICV is 30% lower than the mask volume?
Best regards, Patrycja <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Wolny od wirusów. www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
