I see. Thank you very much!
Cheers,
Ruy
> On Jan 18, 2018, at 1:24 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ruy
> 
> they both register to a .gca atlas that is quite a bit more accurate than 
> the MNI. The details are in the 2002 and 2004 papers.
> 
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2018, 
> Ricardo Valle wrote:
> 
>> Dear Freesurfer community,
>> 
>> I would like to get a better sense of how mri_em_register and 
>> mri_ca_register work. I understand the former is a linear registration and 
>> the latter is nonlinear, and that they are both meant to register an 
>> individual to a template space (MNI152?).
>> 
>> Would it be possible to update the wiki pages to give more information about 
>> the algorithms and cost functions used and other such details? And to 
>> provide references to the literature in support of the algorithms if 
>> possible?
>> 
>> Thank you. Best regards,
>> Ruy
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freesurfer mailing list
>> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
>> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>> 
>> 
>> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> 
> 
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
> 


_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to