External Email - Use Caution Hi, Doug I find two mistakes which may affect the final output after going through FSFAST tutorial again. first, the onset time of each block is wrong. the *original *parameter file is 0 1 16 1 3D 17 0 16 1 FIXATION 33 2 16 1 ZERO-DISPARITY 49 0 16 1 FIXATION 65 1 16 1 81 0 16 1 97 2 16 1 113 0 16 1 129 1 16 1 145 0 16 1 161 2 16 1 177 0 16 1 193 1 16 1 209 0 16 1 225 2 16 1 241 0 16 1 the onset time was plus one seconds and the parameter file *should be changed as*: 0 1 16 1 3D 16 0 16 1 FIXATION 32 2 16 1 ZERO-DISPARITY 48 0 16 1 FIXATION 64 1 16 1 80 0 16 1 96 2 16 1 112 0 16 1 128 1 16 1 144 0 16 1 160 2 16 1 176 0 16 1 192 1 16 1 208 0 16 1 224 2 16 1
240 0 16 1 Second, I converted the dicom file into 4D file (f.nii.gz) mistakenly, which may also causing the wrong output. Thus, I'm trying to re-run the data. * Another question with tksurfer-sess:* when I try to visualized the 1st-level analysis output, using the command: tksurfer-sess -s sess01 -analysis stereozero.sm5.rh -c stereo-vs-zero However, the tksurfer tool use the left hemisphere to process the data. when i used the command: ksurfer-sess -s sess01 -analysis stereozero.sm5.lh -c stereo-vs-zero the tksurfer tool process the data with right hemi. Everything went will just before several hours ago. I found a similar question in the Mail Archive and you relpied that may be an display issue. https://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg45045.html How can I solve this problem? thank you for your help! best, star The message i got from the terminal: tksurfer-sess -s sess01 -analysis stereozero.sm5.rh -c stereo-vs-zero Surface fsaverage lh Map Surface fsaverage lh $Id: FreeSurferEnv.csh,v 1.89 2016/06/09 14:54:31 zkaufman Exp $ Darwin yushandeMacBook-Air.local 17.7.0 Darwin Kernel Version 17.7.0: Thu Jun 21 22:53:14 PDT 2018; root:xnu-4570.71.2~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 Thu Jan 10 13:49:38 CST 2019 /Applications/freesurfer/bin/tksurfer list stereo-vs-zero con/map stereo-vs-zero /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/stereo-vs-zero/sig.nii.gz maplist /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/stereo-vs-zero/sig.nii.gz mri_concat /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/stereo-vs-zero/sig.nii.gz --o /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/tksconcat.nii ninputs = 1 Checking inputs nframestot = 2 Allocing output Done allocing nframes = 2 Writing to /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/tksconcat.nii cd /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero setenv SUBJECTS_DIR /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data tksurferfv fsaverage lh inflated -overlay /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/tksconcat.nii -annot aparc -surf white -surf pial -fminmax 2 4 Contrasts 0 stereo-vs-zero freeview -f /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/surf/lh.pial:curvature=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/surf/lh.curv:visible=0:annot=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/label/lh.aparc.annot:edgethickness=0:annot_outline=1:overlay=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/tksconcat.nii:overlay_threshold=2,4 /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/surf/lh.white:curvature=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/surf/lh.curv:visible=0:annot=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/label/lh.aparc.annot:edgethickness=0:annot_outline=1:overlay=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/tksconcat.nii:overlay_threshold=2,4 /Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/surf/lh.inflated:curvature=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/surf/lh.curv:annot=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/fsaverage/label/lh.aparc.annot:edgethickness=0:annot_outline=1:overlay=/Users/yushanzhou/Documents/data/anatomical_data/stereo_zero/sess01/bold/stereozero.sm5.rh/tksconcat.nii:overlay_threshold=2,4 -viewport 3d cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. reading colortable from annotation file... colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) cached. cached. colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. reading colortable from annotation file... colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) cached. cached. colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. cached. reading colortable from annotation file... colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) cached. cached. colortable with 36 entries read (originally /autofs/space/terrier_001/users/nicks/freesurfer/average/colortable_desikan_killiany.txt) cached. cached. cached. cached. Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> 于2019年1月10日周四 上午7:32写道： > did you look at the zero-disparity vs fixation contrast? Can you send > your paradigm file? Can you send pictures? > > On 1/9/19 12:26 AM, xi star wrote: > > > > External Email - Use Caution > > > > Hi! FS Experts! > > In the fMRI experiment, there are 2 conditions: > > 1# 3D picture > > 2# zero disparity picture > > interleaved with fixation block (0). > > > > To compare 3D-vs-zero disparity, I used command: > > mkcontrast-sess -a 1 -c 2 -nosumconds > > but the results showed more activation then expected. To find the > > problem, I compared 3D-vs-fix (-a 1 -c 0), the result shows the same > > as 3D-vs-zero disparity. > > My question is: > > why the two contrast ( [1 0; 0 -1] and [1 0] ) came to the same > > result? How can I compared the two conditions? > > Thanks a lot ! > > Yours, > > Star > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Freesurfer mailing list > > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer > > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
