I don't think so. The surfaces are at about 1mm resolution, which should be fine for this. The reason that RBV had to be upsampled is that there is no way to represent the different tissue types at a single (big) voxel
On 3/6/19 4:46 PM, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote: > > External Email - Use Caution > > Dear Douglas, > > RBV PVC use the advantage of upsampled gtmseg space at 0.5 mm3 to > compute PVCorrected images. Would it be beneficial to project this > PVCorrected images onto gtmseg space surfaces to keep this upsampled > resolution ? > > Or would it be equivalent to project these PVCorrected images on > gtmseg space onto native surfaces using --reg rbv2anat.lta ? > > Best, > Matthieu > > _______________________________________________ > Freesurfer mailing list > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
