External Email - Use Caution        

Hi Doug

Thank you very much for the very helpful reply! It worked perfectly and was
exactly what I needed. I assume that these are the clusters after
cluster-level correction for multiple comparison since --csd is used?

Thanks,
Keri

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 4:17 AM Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <
dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> wrote:

> Sorry for the delay ...
>
> First, run selxavg3-sess with -fwhm ( you might need to delete the
> bold/analysis folder to get it to re-run).
>
> cd session/bold/analyis
> There will be a filed called fwhm.dat. Look in that. Depending upon how
> much you smoothed it might be something like 10.395. This is the FWHM in
> mm. Next, you can run something like the following command
>
> mri_surfcluster --in contrast/sig.nii.gz --hemi lh --csd
> $FREESURFER_HOME/average/mult-comp-cor/fsaverage/lh/cortex/fwhmXX/abs/thTT/mc-z.cdf
> --mask mask.nii.gz --sum contrast.sum.dat --oannot ./lh.contrast.annot
> --thmin T --sign abs --subject fsaverage --cwpvalthresh .05
>
> Note that the subject must be fsaverage because the tables were computed
> with fsaverage. Above, fwhmXX would be fwhm11 (because the FWHM is 10.395,
> but round up to 11). TT refers to the cluster forming threshold (eg, p<.001
> would be 30), and so --thmin T would be 3. "abs" in the path to the CSD
> file indicates that you want to use an unsigned (absolute) value; you can
> also use pos and neg. --cwpvalthresh .05 means to filter out any clusters
> that are not significant at p=0.05. The cluster table will be in
> contrast.sum.dat
>
> doug
>
>
> On 10/3/2019 7:52 AM, Keri Woods wrote:
>
>         External Email - Use Caution
> Hi
>
> From the 1st level analysis of an fMRI study I'm trying to extract the
> size of the clusters of activation from each subject, but don't know how to
> go about this. I know that for the group analysis you can get the cluster
> sizes from the output from mri_glm-sim. Is there a way to run the multiple
> comparison correction on the first level analysis in order to get this
> table? Or is there another way of getting the cluster sizes?
>
> Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Thank you,
> Keri
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing 
> listfreesur...@nmr.mgh.harvard.eduhttps://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to