External Email - Use Caution Dear Dough,
No worries, this was helpful too. Probably, I will test it on a subset of subjects and compare the two for possible discrepancies. Thank you, Sneha From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Douglas N. Greve Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 11:39 AM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields sorry, did not see this before I responded. Ignore what I said On 5/5/2020 11:13 AM, Iglesias Gonzalez, Juan E. wrote: Dear Sneha, We use cortical and white matter parcels in the hippocampal subfields, which is more reliable than using the whole white / gray matter to compute parameters. But it could be hacked, albeit it would be a bit less reliable. I’ll add this to the wishlist / to-do list (unfortunately it isn’t likely I’ll be able to look at it any time soon…) Cheers, /Eugenio Juan Eugenio Iglesias Senior research fellow CMIC (UCL), MGH (HMS) and CSAIL (MIT) http://www.jeiglesias.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.jeiglesias.com&d=DwMDaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=AEsux002jQ5JzIPYIcsXKAuQmrt-1dubP8ZVldIiOrE&m=B8aRiWly3gmmmg0vnY6wn5kmlR0tHteUEB2hOkzaoCE&s=3enydUNbkb3fHf4FjYUaK6STd9w98j288fmleKlGijs&e=> From: <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu><mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Sneha Pandya <snp2...@med.cornell.edu><mailto:snp2...@med.cornell.edu> Reply-To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu><mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 10:46 To: "freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu"<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu><mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] samseg with subfields External Email - Use Caution Dear experts, I want to revisit if anyone has ran subfield analysis just by running samseg? If it is possible is it as reliable as from running regular routine with “-all” recon-all flag? Thank you, Sneha From: Sneha Pandya Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2020 4:15 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: samseg with subfields Dear experts, Is it possible to run subfield analysis (hippcampal subfields, amygdalar, thalamic nuclei, and brainstem structures) when we only run samseg on our dataset? Thank you, Sneha _______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu_mailman_listinfo_freesurfer&d=DwMDaQ&c=lb62iw4YL4RFalcE2hQUQealT9-RXrryqt9KZX2qu2s&r=AEsux002jQ5JzIPYIcsXKAuQmrt-1dubP8ZVldIiOrE&m=B8aRiWly3gmmmg0vnY6wn5kmlR0tHteUEB2hOkzaoCE&s=_5jkic5DEr2z1of7Gj4w-MCc3lQ0bQW4pV2PmbOSe3w&e=>
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
