Correct, the stable version has the same (adult only) functionality as before.
________________________________
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
<dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 1:42 PM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
External Email - Use Caution
OK. Sorry for confusing with the infant pipeline.
As it relates to the adult stable release package 7.1.1, if we want tracts
using this release we should be using the tracula.beta separately, not the
tracula version in the stable release?
In other words, the beta only has new features but the stable version is OK.
Jim
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> On Behalf Of Yendiki, Anastasia
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:27 PM
To: Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
* External Email - Caution *
The beta is the only tracula version with infant processing options (which as
you know are currently under development ??).
________________________________
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
on behalf of Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
<dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu<mailto:dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu>>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 1:22 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
External Email - Use Caution
We need to analyze some pilot 2yo datasets and need tracts.
We ‘d like to use FS7, which is giving us better surfaces on the 2yo’s than the
current infant FS release.
To clarify, if we wants tracts using the stable FS7.1 release, we should using
the tracula.beta instead?
Jim
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
On Behalf Of Yendiki, Anastasia
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:07 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
* External Email - Caution *
Yes, same. Just FYI, the only "unstable" part of the 7.1.tracula.beta is the
tracula part, everything else is from the stable release. But it would only
make sense to use if you want to try out the newer features.
________________________________
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
on behalf of Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
<dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu<mailto:dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu>>
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:47 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
External Email - Use Caution
Thx Anastasia. I prefer to use the stable releases. So the same
diiffusion/tracula inputs for FS 7 as FS 6, for example\
using a generic dmrirc parameter file ?
Best.
Jim
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
On Behalf Of Yendiki, Anastasia
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 12:42 AM
To: Freesurfer support list
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
* External Email - Caution *
Hi Jim - There should not be any differences in TRACULA between recent stable
releases. I've been committing the new features described on the wiki to the
tracula beta branch on github, so they are available there only. Let us know if
you run into any issues!
Anastasia.
________________________________
From:
freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
on behalf of Alexopoulos, Dimitrios
<dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu<mailto:dimitriosalexopou...@wustl.edu>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 5:04 PM
To: Freesurfer support list
<freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Tracula FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1
External Email - Use Caution
Are there any differences in usage /outputs from Tracula in FS 6 vs FS 7.1.1?
Specifically as it relates to the customized dmrirc config file?
The wiki mentions a beta version of Tracula in FS. 7.2. Will the general usage
be similar to 6/7.1.1?
Jim
________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
________________________________
The materials in this message are private and may contain Protected Healthcare
Information or other information of a sensitive nature. If you are not the
intended recipient, be advised that any unauthorized use, disclosure, copying
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
immediately notify the sender via telephone or return mail.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
