I have not seen anything of that magnitude. I do see a systematic drop
in the thickness with v7 relative to v6, but it is on the order of 1 or
2%. It might be something specific to the pulse sequence that you are
using. Try looking at the surfaces of the subject that has the largest
discrepancy. You can use fvcompare, eg,
fvcompare --s subjectname --sd1 /path/to/v6/subjectsdir --sd2
/path/to/v7/subjectsdir
This will bring up surfaces and segs from both analysis in one freeview
command so that you can inspect them.
On 3/12/2021 11:29 AM, Xiaojiang Yang wrote:
External Email - Use Caution
Dear Freesurfer developers,
I have a cohort of subjects that are already run under FS 6. I
recently upgraded Freesurfer from 6.0 to 7.1.1, and now I also have
run these subjects under FS 7.
When comparing the cortical thickness results obtained from FS6 and
FS7, I found that FS 7 results are much smaller than the FS6 ones. On
average, about 13%-21% decrease in the subject's average cortical
thickness. Specifically, on a cohort of images from GE scanners, the
average cortical thickness from FS6 is 2.5mm, but from FS7 is less
than 2.0mm.
According to some published papers, I think 2.5mm as the average
cortical thickness is more accurate than 2.0mm.
Have you encountered this issue or question before? Do you think I
should keep using FS6? Please give me your advice. Thank you!
John.
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
