Hi Doug, Thanks so much for getting back to me. Below is our previous correspondence:
From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Douglas N. Greve <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> Date: Friday, January 12, 2024 at 4:19 PM To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Issue with mri_glmfit-sim I think v6 might be broken when using -bg. Try removing that. On 1/8/2024 11:19 AM, O'Neill, Alexandra Grace wrote: Hello FS community, To correct for multiple comparisons for the results of a parametric modulation GLM analysis, I have run mri_glmfit-sim using Freesurfer version 6.0 with the following command: mri_glmfit-sim \ --debug --glmdir /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepSec/OSGM/osgm \ --perm 1000 2.0 abs \ --cwp 0.05 \ --2spaces \ --bg 1 The code completes without errors, however none of the output files mentioned in this tutorial<https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki/FsTutorial/MultipleComparisonsV6.0Perm> are created. Below are the contents of the mriglm-fit.log file in case that is helpful. $Id: mri_glmfit.c,v 1.241.2.4 2016/12/08 22:02:40 zkaufman Exp $ cwd /autofs/cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago cmdline mri_glmfit.bin --y /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepNorm/ces.nii.gz --wls /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepNorm/cesvar.nii.gz --fsgd /cluster/eryilmaz/users/FSGD/18_NFE_Patients.fsgd --osgm --glmdir /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepNorm/OSGM --surf fsaverage rh --fwhm 6 sysname Linux hostname tempest.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu machine x86_64 user ago5 FixVertexAreaFlag = 1 UseMaskWithSmoothing 1 fwhm 6.000000 niters 26.000000 OneSampleGroupMean 1 y /autofs/cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepNorm/ces.nii.gz logyflag 0 usedti 0 FSGD /cluster/eryilmaz/users/FSGD/18_NFE_Patients.fsgd labelmask /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/fsaverage/label/rh.cortex.label maskinv 0 glmdir /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepNorm/OSGM IllCondOK 0 ReScaleX 1 DoFFx 0 wFile /cluster/eryilmaz/users/NFE/NFE_Subjects_ago/Analyses_NFE/18_NFE_Patients/SIRPSEC_LOADREG_RH/LoadDepNorm/cesvar.nii.gz weightinv 1 weightsqrt 1 ResidualFWHM 12.847434 SearchSpace 74490.844410 anattype surface Do you have any idea how to fix this problem? Thanks so much in advance! Alexandra Alexandra G. O'Neill (she/her) Clinical Research Coordinator Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Psychiatry Division of Neuropsychiatry and Neuromodulation 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129 T: (617) 726-8753 | E: agone...@mgh.harvard.edu<mailto:agone...@mgh.harvard.edu> Thank you, Alexandra ________________________________ From: Greve, Douglas N.,Ph.D. <dgr...@mgh.harvard.edu> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2024 2:44 PM To: O'Neill, Alexandra Grace <agone...@mgh.harvard.edu>; Freesurfer support list <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Issue with mri_glmfit-sim Sorry, I already forgot what the problem was. Can you include our previous correspondence? Also, make sure to reply to the list. Thanks! On 1/19/2024 10:07 AM, O'Neill, Alexandra Grace wrote: Hi Doug, Thank you for getting back to me. Unfortunately, the issue is persisting, and the command is still running but with no output files. Is there anything else that could potentially be the problem? I’m attaching the most recent log file (as a txt file) from the command I ran. Please let me know if any other information would be helpful! Thank you so much, Alexandra
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted). If you do not wish to continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of this message immediately. Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail.
