I’m not taking sides on this one, but I’ll nevertheless pinpoint that you can 
also get a sbTIV using SynthSeg, hehe.
Looking forward to reading people’s opinions on this one!

--
Juan Eugenio Iglesias
http://www.jeiglesias.com

From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu 
<freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on behalf of Jackson Lee 
<jackso...@student.unimelb.edu.au>
Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2024 at 7:29 PM
To: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu <freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: [Freesurfer] Choice of ICV estimation

        External Email - Use Caution
Hi there,

My question is related to FreeSurfer’s calculations for intracranial volume 
(ICV): Given the importance to consider ICV as a potential covariate when 
assessing volumetric differences in ROIs between groups, which ICV output is 
recommended?

FreeSurfer’s recon-all generates eTIV (which is widely used by default in 
literature, and is a registration-based method). Conversely, the SAMSEG 
pipeline generates sbTIV (relatively newer approach which is a 
segmentation-based method). While these two would be the most obvious choice, 
many papers also consider correcting for supratentorial volume to be an 
appropriate approach.

To some degree, the choice of method would be guided by the research question. 
However in the most simple of cases (e.g., non-clinical cohorts), what method 
is recommended? Why would someone, for example, opt to use sbTIV over eTIV?

Warm regards,
Jackson Lee

_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is 
addressed.  If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail 
contains patient information, please contact the Mass General Brigham 
Compliance HelpLine at https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline 
<https://www.massgeneralbrigham.org/complianceline> .
Please note that this e-mail is not secure (encrypted).  If you do not wish to 
continue communication over unencrypted e-mail, please notify the sender of 
this message immediately.  Continuing to send or respond to e-mail after 
receiving this message means you understand and accept this risk and wish to 
continue to communicate over unencrypted e-mail. 

Reply via email to