Steve, I hope this doesn't just add more to the confusion, but the .bin file for the SM1000 is about 227k that is flashed from Linux, but if I extract that same code down to my Windows machine using the DFU program it's 1025k.
I am not part of the code team, so I have no idea why there is such a difference, but that's just an observation I have witnessed. I say this only so that you don't let the code size between environments make you think it's not still correct. Try it out to see what happens. I suspect the Windows side probably has a lot of extra overhead as do most Windows apps, and clearly the Linux side is a great deal more efficient. All the best, Walter/K5WH -----Original Message----- From: Steve [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 3:33 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Freetel-codec2] Fresh build of SM1000 firmware on a windows machine. Just a note, but on my Ubuntu 16 32-bit Virtual Box, it resulted in 1305108 for the sm1000.elf, and after the 'objcopy' conversion, the .bin result was 305884. I had to download the V 1.7.1 ZIP file manually, as the web site gave me a short version that was gimped and wouldn't unzip. I just downloaded it manually after registering and put it in the 'dl' directory. Also the name changed to en.stm32f4_dsp_stdperiph_lib.zip so I dropped the 'en.' before putting it in 'dl'. I hope all that makes sense. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Freetel-codec2 mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
