I am Muhammad Usman Akbar from Pakistan and a student of Telecom
engineering final year from islamia University of Bahawalpur.
I am taking about the following IC's.
1. TPS54329E used in the power circuit (12-15 VDC -> 5 VDC
2. STMPS2141 used in OTG USB interface
3. EMIF02-USB03F2 also used in OTG USB interface
4. LD3985M33R used in 5V to 3.3 V PS.

On Mon, Dec 28, 2020, 11:49 PM David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hello Usman,
>
> 1/ Can you please send us a link that explains your project, who you are,
> and your University Department?  We are happy assist with student projects
> but need to be sure they are not defense related.
>
> 2/ Also pls ask a specific question - such as "can I substitute this part
> number (data sheet link) for SM1000 component XYZ".  You will have to do
> your homework first - working out which parts you need t substitute.
>
> - David
> On 28/12/20 6:03 pm, Muhammad Usman Akbar wrote:
>
> Hi, Everyone
> I am final year student and want to design a same SM1000 hardware.
> I am working on a hardware design of SM1000.
> I am following the version F available online on GitHub Rowetel.
> I face some problems in selecting components because components used in
> SM1000 previously not available in my country (Pakistan). Or some of the
> components not clearly find on internet.
> Anyone here who guide me to found alternate components or the same.
> Your reply is highly appreciated.
> Thanks in  advance.
>
> Regards:
> Usman
>
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020, 4:17 AM David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jesper,
>>
>> I think if you use clean samples - ie person speaking close to the mic
>> (but not clipped), you might be able to make it a bit better.
>>
>> Increasing the bit rate is a major job - but you could try other open
>> source codecs like Opus.
>>
>> - David
>> On 18/12/20 8:39 am, Jesper Norberg wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> So, these samples I picked up from drill sergeants on youtube, the ones I
>> use in the end will be cleaner.
>> Ideally I would like to get at least some amount of agitation in the
>> voice to work, it does seem like a very plausible scenario if we're talking
>> soldier communication potentially mid-combat.
>> I'm going to experiment a bit to see if I can figure out a mastering
>> chain that filters out what confuses the algorithm.
>>
>> Do you think it's possible to improve the results by increasing the
>> bitrate? If so, how would you suggest I approach it? Is it sufficient to
>> expand on the 3200 algorithm or would the assumptions you mentioned also
>> need to be changed?
>>
>> Best regards
>> Jesper
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 8:18 PM David Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jesper,
>>>
>>> Interesting samples!  It seems to do OK on what I would call "clean
>>> speech" - e.g. the female starting at 1:02, and male at 1:30, but struggles
>>> with the people shouting, or samples that were recorded from microphones
>>> far away from the speaker (room acoustics).  I had trouble understanding
>>> some of the source samples.
>>>
>>> I'm sorry but I don't think there is much we can do with pre-processing
>>> to improve the quality.  To get the very low bit rates we make certain
>>> assumptions about the input speech, e.g. the people speaking close to the
>>> microphone.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> David
>>> On 17/12/20 10:24 pm, Jesper Norberg wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone!
>>>
>>> I'm working on a project where I want to add a digital radio feel to
>>> military voice lines. I found codec2 and really like the sound in the
>>> examples, but I'm having trouble reproducing the same audio quality. Some
>>> of it sounds good, but especially when the voice line gets more agitated it
>>> starts breaking apart. Appending an audio sample to show what I mean, this
>>> is a 8khz 16 bit mono sample with a codec2 bitrate of 3200, which from what
>>> I understand should be the highest quality. The sample is first women then
>>> men, both with examples in descending intensity.
>>>
>>> I'm a bit new at this, is there any preprocessing/settings that I could
>>> apply in order to improve the quality?
>>>
>>> Original
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IWyV_CwK0KYXC0_ZN3t3QJNk9UCwTOp9/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>>
>>> codec2 - 3200
>>>
>>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ww1QsNUw8s5TLQXQnBln4CkgpmjUuVFS/view?usp=sharing
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>> Jesper
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freetel-codec2 mailing 
>>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetel-codec2 mailing 
>> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing 
> [email protected]https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetel-codec2 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2
>
_______________________________________________
Freetel-codec2 mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freetel-codec2

Reply via email to