Well, this is a bit of a wet blanket. I'd like to add a question to the survey: 
How many people are running Freevo as part of their ordinary PC (I.E., second 
display/head while having their X desktop on the primary) and how many are 
using a stand-alone box, hooked up to the living room TV (or something 
similar)? I've always felt (and it's probably true) that most people were in 
the former category, so all the talk of going to TFT displays over CRT 
displays... does it apply to me? I'm not chomping at the bit to run out and get 
a flat-screen TV.

My setup is stand-alone to an HD Rear Projection CRT TV. It's old, but I got it 
for a deep discount from a friend and it was quite a step up from the 27" SD 
CRT we used to have in the apartment. Besides, as old as it is, it still looks 
GREAT. My Freevo runs on an Athlon XP1900+ and a MiniATX of a similar vintage, 
with a Matrox G400 (I actually had one already) and a PVR-250 for recording. 
It's been running the SVN version flawlessly for a long time (excepting the 
upgrade to Python 2.5, which was a hiccup) and I love having it around.

I guess one of the things I liked the most about the Freevo was being able to 
cobble it together out of leftovers (the CPU, video card and audio card), 
giveaways (motherboard from work) and low cost purchases (PVR-250, refurb Antec 
case). I understand eventually we have to give up and move on (I'm going 
through that struggle with my main PC right now) but I'm always at a loss with 
what to do with the old hardware. The CPU, sound and video for the Freevo were 
former main PC parts. A trickle-down system. ^_^

Now I'm currently using SDL/DFB to drive the video... Dischi said he didn't 
know how well the clutter SDL backend would drive DFB. Assuming it works, would 
the 2.0 interfaces run on a setup like mine? I'm not hot to upgrade to HD 
recording/playback just yet (nothing HD to record except the XBox 360) but I'm 
so excited about the 2.0 interface, especially the ability to overlay graphics 
on the video playback. If it's just a matter of my setup not supporting HD 
video, that's totally fine with me. I have no way to pipe HD content to the TV 
from the Freevo anyway. The TV is pre-HDMI/DVI and the VGA input is limited to 
640x480.

Yes, I know: "You need a new TV!" Not yet. This one does everything I want. I 
don't need to run out and spend money on a new TV when it could be better spent 
elsewhere. And it occurs to me that for those in the first category mentioned 
at the start of this e-mail, an upgrade to HD display is easy! Heck, my PC is 
on a 16:10 LCD display. That wasn't expensive. A brand shiny new 16:9 LCD TV? 
They don't cost what they used to, but they're still 10x the cost of this 
monitor.

In the end I suppose I just wanted to add my dissent to the poll. I totally 
understand that new features are going to exceed the capabilities of old 
hardware. I just question the complete and total cutoff. Give me the 2.0 
interface on my old hardware, and I'll be happy. When I get to the point I have 
HD content to record and/or play back, I'll start upgrading the box. Not all of 
us are bent on riding the bleeding edge of the wave. ^_~

Thanks for reading this far. I know I usually end up writing long e-mails... 
and sorry for that. And yes, eventually I'll post up some of the fixes I've 
made lately... I promise!

James
Burbank, CA  USA



----- Original Message ----
> From: Jason Tackaberry <t...@urandom.ca>
> To: freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Cc: freevo-us...@lists.sourceforge.net; dun...@freevo.org
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 3:21:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Freevo-devel] Please Read: Making Python 2.5 a requirement
> 
> On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 23:53 +0100, Dirk Meyer wrote:
> > So after the 2.4 question, here a new one: anyone not using X11 and why?
> 
> I'm also interested in answers especially that don't involve old
> hardware.
> 
> This may be a controversial statement, but we're not considering older
> hardware at all for Freevo 2.0.  Your trusty old Matrox G450 might
> handle interlaced content like nobody's business, but it's not going to
> cut it. :)



      

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel

Reply via email to