On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 08:18:48PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > Phil Sutter dixit: > > >together in their logical context. Nobody likes a single Big Patch for > >everything, and having all changes to a single file separated is the > >same as cutting the Big Patch around the diff-markers. > > Ok, now let me ask you bluntly: are you people really doing > development on the PATCHES? Because, I always assumed we're > doing development on the software instead. Separating diffs > with regard to their functionality is only done when a diff > is sent upstream, or, in the kernel case, when some changes > are maintained separately.
Yes, that's exactly our intention! Marcus and I have sent many patches to upstream or integrate then if they are maintained outside. That's one principle of FreeWRT! > Now, shut up (about the diffs) and hack (on the code itself). ??? I see that's no one besides wbx and tg (the initiators) feels confident about the bsd style of patch management. I suggest we should simply not use it. Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
