Hi,
On Mon, 14 May 2007 at 21:52 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:00:17PM +0200, Lothar Gesslein wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 00:52 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote:
> > > if the additional feature makes _really_ sense for us, do it. But
> > > please, consider the current situation: we have all development and user
> > > information in one place (namely: trac), which is really a great help
> > > for all of us. I really like the timeline feature! All information in
> > > one place, including wiki and source changes!
> >
> > The handbook is not in trac. This makes the vast majority of
> > documentation beeing not in trac. =P
>
> The handbook was in trac before, until the team decided not to maintain
> 2 dokus in parallel. So, wbx copied everythin to the handbook and
> deleted dopple information from trac. A system to generate a doc
> directly out of a wiki would be more useful in my eyes, never seen such
> a system. The layout quality of the handbook can also be optimized. But:
> a handbook is professional.
>
> For every new information a developer has to decide if you have to put
> it on the website or into the handbook. Does this fit into you concept?
Let's say following. Information get first into a wiki (no matter if
it is trac wiki or something else) and then go to some sort of
quality procedure and ends up in the user or developer handbook.
Both handbooks will be available for the upcoming 1.1 release.
Same happened in the past for the user handbook. First we started to
collect useful information and then Phil and me started to use this
to hack the first handbook.
bye
Waldemar
--
don't open your wrt, free it
http://www.freewrt.org
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
