On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:13:37PM +0200, Lothar Gesslein wrote: > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 17:48 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote: > > I follow your discussions with interest. Why do your think trac's wiki > > features are not enough? Isn't a wiki just a tool to collect information > > or is it more? > > Well, yes it is, but tracs wiki is quite basic. For example, discussion > pages are missing. I think Mediawiki has some additional interesting > features like stable pages (which are work in progress afaik, but maybe > quite usefull), a very good handling of templates and a lot of stuff in > the background to help administering it. You know, there are some very > very large wiki sites using Mediawiki, so there _has_ to be something > good off it ;P > But as said, i'll have a deeper look at some others when i find the > time, maybe even at tracs wiki. > > Maybe there are ways to include it nicely with the trac wiki, like > sharing the WikiLinks or the search results... but this is not that > important, having a easy to handle wiki engine is.
Hi Lothar, if the additional feature makes _really_ sense for us, do it. But please, consider the current situation: we have all development and user information in one place (namely: trac), which is really a great help for all of us. I really like the timeline feature! All information in one place, including wiki and source changes! I am using MediaWiki by myself for our internal company documentation for a very long time, but for me trac is not so bad as it looks to you. Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
