Owen,

I find it quite refreshing to hear someone express the viewpoint that we
simply don't know to what extent human activity effects global warming.  My
left-wing-nut friends all go batty on the subject, falling down on their
knees to worship Al Gore when the subject comes up.  Even the smart ones are
totally sold on the concept that humans caused the current global warming
trend.

Anyone who claims to have figured out this particular global complex system
and is stating with absolute certainty that humans are The Cause of the
current climate trend goes down in my book as just a tad gullible.

I concede that it is possible, perhaps even likely that humans are affecting
the global climate.  But we certainly don't understand the global/celestial
climate dynamic well enough to prove it.  I mean come on, for crying out
loud:  we just discovered that neutrinos have mass.  We think.

--Doug

-- 
Doug Roberts, RTI International
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell

On 8/11/07, Owen Densmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I have to agree .. in the sense that a SFI climate paleontologist
> couched the issue:
>    There is certainly a very recent correlation between CO2 and an
> upward trend in temperature.  But when one looks at multi-million
> year variations, we are actually in a cool area, and that the cause/
> effect between any human activity pales in comparison to things like
> meteor impacts and volcanic action.  Thus much of the buzz is likely
> very inaccurate and unfounded.  BUT, personally, there is certainly
> no reason to NOT minimize man's impact on the environment.
>
> I think when the dust settles (so to speak!) we'll find that we
> simply currently have no idea why the earth goes through ice ages and
> hot ages.  We may get hints if we really honestly try.  But I go
> along with the SFI researcher: it doesn't hurt to be cautious.
>
> Its interesting that there are large gas/oil reserves under the ice
> caps.  Yet how did that happen if these result from organic decay?
> Dyson also has an answer for that: there may be earth-core activities
> that contribute a great deal to oil.
>
>      -- Owen
>
> ============================================================
> FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
> Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
> lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to