Fixed that for you. Opinions are always welcomed. On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Jochen Fromm <j...@cas-group.net> wrote:
> In the age of social media and social networks > privacy has become an issue of intense debate. > Privacy means an individual has the right to be secure from unauthorized > disclosure of information about oneself. > > Now if a state has "state secrets", is this fundamentally different from > privacy issues for > the individual (only for the state)? Should > a state in a democracy have any real secrets > at all? And if the state has the right to prevent invasion of privacy, > shouldn't the individual have the same right, too? > > In my opinion, It is clearly evil what Wikileaks has done recently, > and I think they went to far this time. But too much censorship > and secrecy is not a good idea, either (as the "top secret america" > investigation from the Washington Post showed). What do you think? > > -J. > > > ============================================================ > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College > lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org > -- Doug Roberts drobe...@rti.org d...@parrot-farm.net 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
