So... here's a paradox... or is it a conundrum:

I choose to live in a world with as little fear or paranoia as possible (some may not see that from my postings here, but I claim it to be true).

So, to secure my wireless network, to encrypt my e-mail, to encrypt my hard drive, to use obfuscating proxies in my network/computer life would be to invite a much more dangerous and scary world in than I want to live in. Just as adding deadbolts to my doors at home or putting a lo-jack in my vehicle, or keeping a loaded gun in my bedstand would feel like inviting in the bad things they are supposed to keep out. I've lived decades without any of those and I can't say I have any significant reason to feel like a chump about it, while I know folks (there may be some here) who are pretty sure that if they didn't shoot their triple-deadbolt and set their "armed response" security system every time they go through their door, that they would be victim of home invasion, etc.

On the other hand, I understand the logic of wanting erstwhile criminals to assume that "everyone owns a gun and knows how to use it", and the logic of sending private communication by sealed envelope, or using SSL/TLS for e-mail (and other) communication over an otherwise open network.

So is there a "best of both worlds"? I try to strike this by leaving my wireless network open to use by "anyone", but setting up my e-mail client with SSL/TLS and only sending sensitive information over the web via https . I can imagine using the disk-level encryption provided on my system as a matter of course, but I *can't* imagine setting up an obfuscating web proxy and insisting that all my co-mmunicants decrypt my e-mails with PGP, etc.

This all smacks so strongly of immune systems and complex population/prey/symbiote/parasite communities that I feel like I need to go back and review Stephanie Forrest's work again.


On Haystacks: There are two types of cracking that can occur to an individual 1 - Targeted: The bad guy (NSA, a malicious cracker...) is after you specifically. 2 - Non-Targeted: The bad guy casts a broad net, or inspects a big haystack, for exposed individuals

If 1), your chances are really low of avoiding being hacked unless the bad guy is novice.

2) is a double edged sword. Being concerned about encryption email routing and storage has merit if the trolling is simply putting up a wall, saying "move along, nothing here". But it also puts up a sign saying "I have a reason to hide"

My guess is that all of us using any sort of extra measures, such as encryption, are definitely on the NSA books.

 -- Owen


On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Steve Smith <sasm...@swcp.com <mailto:sasm...@swcp.com>> wrote:

    Marcus

        Public advocacy for having ubiquitous secure transfers is a
        stronger signal for them to contemplate.

    Agreed.

            yes, these are the fruits of a paranoid mind, but just
            because you are paranoid, *doesn't* mean they aren't out
            to get you.

        Speaking of paranoia, here's a little Thunderbird add-in that
        aims to check that all of the e-mail hops were secure.  It's a
        little buggy, but a nice idea (double check its work if it
        gives you a happy face).

    I get happy faces over the strangest things... and in fact, I like
    highwire work without checking the net before I go up... it just
    feels like bad juju.  It is merely important (to me) to know that
    I *can* check the net if I choose to... that it is checkable and I
    am competent to do so and nobody gets too wIerded out if I do.


        https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/paranoia/

    - Steve


    ============================================================
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
    to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com




============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

Reply via email to