So Frank has been harassing me with psychobabble >8^D and during the course of it, I finally snapped and thought again about this paper:
Experience Grounds Language https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.10151 The idea is that WS3 and higher *ground* the algorithm such that it's mechanism and output will match, more naturally, the mechanism and output of us humans. Psychodynamics (the process by which some sympathetic nit-picker infiltrates your mind through an interplay between your words and theirs) is simply a Turing test. (Shirley, we've all met Eliza: <http://psych.fullerton.edu/mbirnbaum/psych101/Eliza.htm>) We ought to be able to automate psychodynamics so that a patient can talk to their computer and reap the same (or better) results than going to a meat space Freud. And, sure enough, I found this: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22242553 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/An-automated-method-of-content-analysis-for-A-Salvatore-Gelo/a0f2ffdbf9abe716ac30e37f63f7d6c7e72e4c45 -- ☣ uǝlƃ .-. .- -. -.. --- -- -..-. -.. --- - ... -..-. .- -. -.. -..-. -.. .- ... .... . ... FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
