Hi Glen, Thank you, and yes, I did submit it somewhere. There are a couple of different evolution journals where this kind of subject is published. They all have length limits — 140 characters or something like that — which this thing exceeds. I don’t even remember which of them I sent to, because their formats turn out to be quite similar. Mostly I was trying to get it before the eyes of a couple of people whom I hope the editor will ask as reviewers, who I think will immediately understand what the move is, because it is so close to where they have already come, and that they will agree that it is a kind of natural completion of what Price and also they were trying to do. After that the editor will reject it, but I can ask for advice on whether there is anyplace it could be published, without violating the conditions of review.
I am horrible at timeliness on reviews, and during COVID, everyone else has become uncommonly bad as well. So it could be years before I hear anything. I have another paper that is now out for about 30 months to a Springer journal; this one has only been out maybe 8 or 10 months. Many thanks, Eric > On Mar 25, 2021, at 8:02 PM, ⛧ glen <geprope...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That paper is positively pornographic! Well done. > > If I understand what you're doing, which I most likely don't, the mechanized > graphs are an excellent example of some rhetoric I'm currently trying to > foist on some unwilling victims (re the "languages" within which we couch > hypotheses, and how "language" choice sets a frame/paradigm). > > But they're academics. And I am not. So I'd like to confirm that you've > submitted it somewhere, regardless of your expectations of acceptance? I > don't need to know where. If so, I'll feel more confident in encouraging them > to read it. > > > On March 24, 2021 4:46:23 PM PDT, David Eric Smith <desm...@santafe.edu> > wrote: >> I will claim that part of the problem is a bad problem in conceptual >> delineation in much (not all!) of the community, which the terminology >> canalizes and makes it hard to escape from. For part of that I do have >> something I think is a corrective. I don’t know if it will ever be >> accepted anywhere, so I put it on the BioRxiv here: >> https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.biorxiv.org%2fcontent%2f10.1101%2f2021.02.09.430402v1.abstract&c=E,1,BJI4v-sKlAKG9TTqIjaeaWW0r---JGH7j68TIOfK62NVQsDk3M1v4LKlGLHYHYl0IGS6JpyKBEFpWW760HkvNqZI01T4whPz2owBEjJEDEpvH3wrgQ,,&typo=1 >> <https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=https%3a%2f%2fwww.biorxiv.org%2fcontent%2f10.1101%2f2021.02.09.430402v1.abstract&c=E,1,PiNnB4Mea11E3NbOf1J9kiBNwaJm_D356Z9AK-rtlkWlamy0uIN4X23SortvEWwhFmu1adf-m6N63uM8CxTaVIkw5JBVfpjNgjmV75TSNav8oe1eXG9LRLs,&typo=1> >> >> > -- > glen ⛧ > > - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . > FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv > Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam > un/subscribe > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2fredfish.com%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffriam_redfish.com&c=E,1,jTkiNMZtdQ1uNqOsVnezyRqbHe-SxTXmI7D0UmwuSZmJksmhwyT1RoofiMlOyCY9q-0d5D_h3dyKSsv5RUSFglIPv0Pj_zL1w4SNsDHwA4OszTHloi0,&typo=1 > FRIAM-COMIC > https://linkprotect.cudasvc.com/url?a=http%3a%2f%2ffriam-comic.blogspot.com%2f&c=E,1,I8djZZhjllB6yqRk0T7k-_DDIplJhDVZ4ie8WYfAIh4ZftwbrEKTuDhxEo--QOaeyx_2OruXXU3fk0n8aI2k6lY4a3Uk_CggHgtg0faoO30ShqfyTkSMVTgcv3s,&typo=1 > archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ - .... . -..-. . -. -.. -..-. .. ... -..-. .... . .-. . FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn GMT-6 bit.ly/virtualfriam un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ archives: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
