Oh Gosh, Jochen.  On the one hand I am deeply indebted to FRIAM members for 
allowing me to noodle in areas of thought where I have no business; on the 
other hand, I feel obligated not to hide from you how very, very bad I think 
Mary C. Lamia’s thinking is.  In the first place, lover of metaphors that am, I 
think the anthropomorphism of the brain is one of the most dangerous metaphors 
a human can bring to psychology, because it sets off an eternal loop of thought 
from which there is no escape.   Meteorology and Psychology have much in 
common.  They both have to do with objects with innards operating in 
environments.  With Psychology, the objects are human, the innards are the guts 
and brain, and the environment is the people and things around us.  In 
Meteorology, the objects are the storms, the innards are the fronts and other 
structures of cyclones, and the environment is the earth’s surface and the 
larger circulation of its atmosphere.  Perhaps I feel drawn to Meteorology just 
because it seems so like a behavioral science.  (Or, to get the order of events 
right, I was drawn to Psychology because it was so like Meteorology.)   But we 
must keep our levels of organization straight.  And if we, like Mary C., are to 
make metaphors between the whole (the person) and the part (the brain) and then 
to say that the part is manipulating the whole, she ought to be damn clear what 
kind of metaphorical world she his let herself into or she will never get out 
alive. I don’t think she knows anything she is talking about.  I would be 
terrified if one of my college-aged grandchildren were to fall into the hands 
of such a person.  

 

I am deeply sorry if I am being a jerk.  (And will no doubt deeplier sorrier 
when one of you points out both that I am both being a jerk and  that I am 
wrong).  If you were tempted to carry on this conversation further, now I have 
been a jerk, I would love to explore with you how some aspect of Mary’s thought 
accorded with your experience and perhaps gave you comfort or insight because 
of that.  When she talks of the brain, what is she actually talking about for 
you.  Because, if one thing is damned sure, it is that when people talk about 
their brains, they are talking about something they have never touched or seen 
or heard or felt.  They are talking about a beetle in a box, a nothing.  Or 
they are using the brain as a model of behavior.  

 

OK, Russ, Dave, Glen, Marcus, Erics, have at me.  

 

Nick

 

From: Friam <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Jochen Fromm
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2025 2:10 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Subject: [FRIAM] Your personal truth

 

If Nick shares his struggles with weather I can share my unqualified thoughts 
about psychology :-P I was thinking about the orange menace, how he deceives 
everyone and how he manipulates his followers by controlling their emotions and 
I was wondering if emotions deceive us in general. Do emotions deceive us by 
creating a reality distortion field that paints the objects they have 
identified as desirable (primarily food & mates for supper and pairing time) in 
the brightest colors? 

 

Emotions certainly need to manipulate us in order to control us. Their purpose 
is to influence our behavior and interactions. Psychologist Mary C. Lamia 
writes "Without any deliberate effort on your part, your brain evaluates every 
situation you encounter and decides if an emotion should be activated to alert 
and protect you" [1]. They are in a sense the PR machine and advertising agency 
of the body. As if the body would create an advertising agency that highlights 
the objects it should seek. 

 

Emotions deceive us because they exaggerate. If we are in love they turn the 
desired object of person into some kind of wonderful dream. We only perceive 
positive traits while negative ones are overlooked. If we hate something we 
only perceive negative traits. These distortions act on top of your beliefs 
which "create a cognitive lens through which you interpret the events of your 
world" [2]

 

They exaggerate to alert and protect us. Mary C. Lamia writes "By creating 
anxiety, anger, sadness, fear, guilt, shame, disgust, embarrassment, or any 
number of emotional responses that your brain has at its disposal, your 
emotional system attempts to inform and protect you by making you feel whatever 
it is you need to know." [1]

 

Emotions deceive us because they can be misguided based on your previous 
experience, for example in anxiety disorders or addiction: "Your emotional 
system has no reason to lie, although it can be misguided based on your 
previous experiences in the world that have informed it." [1]

 

Apparently emotions create a personal truth for each of us which shows us the 
world as they (on behalf of our selfish genes) want us to see it. A kind of 
personalized, distorted version of reality that reflects the importance of each 
object based on our personal longings and desires. Mary C. Lamia writes 
"nevertheless, your emotions will tell you the truth - your truth - even if you 
don't want to listen." [1]

 

[1] 
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/intense-emotions-and-strong-feelings/201208/do-emotions-lie

 

[2] 
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/living-forward/202009/how-your-thinking-creates-your-reality

 

-J.

 

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to