This one time, at band camp, Alex Smith wrote:
>On 03/07/06, Christian Hamar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>Hello there.
>>
>>Today i bumped all packages for gtk+2 version 2.10.0
>>
>>I needed to bump glib2 and pango to unstable version (1.13.X)
>>
>>librsvg goes to unstable too (X.15.X)
>>
>>libgnomeui goes to unstable too (2.15.1)
>
>I read your chat with crazy about bumping the whole Gnome to 2.15.x. IMO,
>this would be a *good* idea, so that we can iron out bugs ready for when
>2.16 final is released. The reason I say this is because I only actually
>finished ironing out all the bugs from the 2.14 bump a week ago, and the
>bump was several months ago. By using 2.15 in current gives us a longer time
>to test it - Gnome 2.16 is only a few weeks before 0.5, so we'd only have
>that time to test if we didn't bump to 2.15. Also we can gather bug reports
>from -current users.
>
>That's just what I think anyway. Anyone should feel free to comment on this.

Yes, i think this should be a good idea.


IroNiQ
-- 
Member of Frugalware Developer Team
Web: http://www.ironiq.hu
LinuxCounter: #331532
_______________________________________________
Frugalware-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel

Reply via email to