VMiklos wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:23:21AM +0100, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I think whatever *I* or the other like it or whatever not you will still >> try to get some up_foo && up_foo_init_scripts runnig on Frugalware, >> so the best thing is to *backup* the runit repo and rm -rf it. Then >> start working on up_foo. The other problem I have with up_foo are the bugs >> and afaik even on ****buntu are some weird bugs , which just means >> forget the new init system for 0.6 because is way to late ( already ) >> and up_foo >> will need much more testing. >> > > so the decision is to stop working on the runit repo and remove the "new > init system" item from TODO-0.6? > > (btw i still like the idea of runit, but i don't have time to do it > completely myself - i planned to help creating small patches like > implemention missing --foreground options or small modifications to > runit > > i mean i'm a bit surprised that now both of you started to dislike runit >
Huch? I don't dislike runit. You know Alex :P he will try to get up_foo runnig, is why I said *do backup* the runit repo first .) > from one day to another :) and Alex stated his 2 objections - i offered > to help solving both of them..) > > udv / greetings, > VMiklos > > crazy _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
