Alex Smith wrote: > Gabriel C wrote: > >>> You do not need to be an expert, once you learn how do do it, which took >>> me about 10 mins to learn, it's easy. >>> >>> >> you have too if you want *event* based init scripts ( maybe is why >> ****buntu still does not full use this but a weird symlink && whatever >> mix ). >> > > Blah. Total blah. It is perfectly easy. Say you want to respond to the > 'foo' event. Just do this > > on foo > > Voila. > > >> Of course we have to learn this bus is not the point and is not done in >> 10 minutes even the up_foo devel does NOT know ( yet ) how to solve some >> *event based stuff* ( is on up_foo ML && wiki ). >> > > That's why I'm talking with him right now. > > >> The other thing is up_foo *does NOT support splashy nor uspalsh with >> this event stuff* >> > > We're working on it. > > >> *and* with the *event* stuff you have to make the init >> system depends()|rodepends() on 'udev,hal,dbus'. Shall I tell you more >> odd stuff ? or you want figure yourself ? >> > > That is total BS. There is *NO* udev, hal, or dbus code in there at all. > really WTF are you talking about. It's done over a socket, not DBloatBus >
Brrrrrrr. 'with the sysvinit emulation shit based on runlevels* you don't need it , *I said if you want a full based even one*. This emulation fu** is *what* ununtu is running LOL!. Then again why to hell use something , *uses* the INIT|INIT STYLE WE DON'T WANT! brr brr brr > >> Pls don't tell me now *but it can be done using sysvinit* I know this >> but the point is *we want to change sysvinit* and not replace by >> something add sysvinit back ... >> > > It's not a sysvinit hack... There is *NO* sysvinit code in there. Ok, it > was started from sysvinit, but gradually it was replaced with better > code. Whatever better code or not is a sysvinit *fork*. > Actually reading about upstart in detail really helps. This > LugRadio episode might help - http://www.lugradio.org/episodes/61 - go > to 57 minutes into it, the Upstart developer is talking there. > .... >> And again just do it , I don't want flame about I just think a 'init >> system' should be small , fast , ( not having weird depends ) , easy to >> understand ( not only for devels , think on server admins as example ) , >> of course is my opinion. >> > > No weird depends, depends on glibc, that's all. In 'emulation modus' yes. > It's fast - at least, > performs better than sysvinit here. I don't really care whatever foo_init boots 2 or 3 secs faster or whatever not. At last on ubuntu is *slow* as hell. > Server admins can understand it > easily We will see , I don't think so. > - I'm actually going to write some documentation for Upstart. > > Thanks, > Alex > > crazy _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list Frugalware-devel@frugalware.org http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
