On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:47:43AM +0100, Wael Nasreddine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I know about it, but looking at the revert patch, it wouldn't be *that* hard > to > port it to new versions of udev, I mean take a look at it[1].
yes, but using patches permanently that will never hit upstram is not something we like to do ;) > anyway It's too bad they droped udev support for klibc coz You really > feel the difference when booting with initramfs/klibc or > initrd/busybox, it's much faster any comparision between klibc and dietlibc? afaik udev works fine with dietlibc without any patch udv / greetings, VMiklos -- Developer of Frugalware Linux, to make things frugal - http://frugalware.org _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
