On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 02:02:16PM +0100, VMiklos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 08:47:43AM +0100, Wael Nasreddine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I know about it, but looking at the revert patch, it wouldn't be *that* > > hard to > > port it to new versions of udev, I mean take a look at it[1]. > > yes, but using patches permanently that will never hit upstram is not > something we like to do ;) Oh okay, no problem then, not a lot of code need re-writing for busybox or any other solution we come up with, hopefullt *whatever* it is udev will run on early space with it... > > > anyway It's too bad they droped udev support for klibc coz You really > > feel the difference when booting with initramfs/klibc or > > initrd/busybox, it's much faster > > any comparision between klibc and dietlibc? afaik udev works fine with > dietlibc without any patch Hmmm I haven't heard of dietlibc, let me finish compiling the kernel (this PC is killing me 7 hours and counting :@) with FS/IDE/ATA modules, and i'll start testing them I already have klibc-related FrugalBuilds, will do now dietlibc FrugalBuilds, If/When the system runs fine here (piix + ext3 on this system) I'll upload everything to my server hopefully tonight though
-- Wael Nasreddine http://wael.nasreddine.com PGP: 1024D/C8DD18A2 06F6 1622 4BC8 4CEB D724 DE12 5565 3945 C8DD 18A2 .: An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs, would never make a good program. (L. Torvalds 1995) :. _______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
