On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 04:56:59AM +0100, Csaba Henk <[email protected]> wrote: > The first hunk was put back because I think the "wpa_supplicant" directive > becomes now > the preferred method of letting wpa_supplicant(.conf) take control. > > Re: checking the pointer: it's unnecessary at that point, because that code > chunck lies > in a block guarded by a "if(ptr != NULL)" condition. > > I attach a patch updated accordingly.
Applied, thanks!
pgpsj0tytnykp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Frugalware-devel mailing list [email protected] http://frugalware.org/mailman/listinfo/frugalware-devel
