Umm... someone ELSE showed the fact that, there is something with backspace, and MS... Learn to read, ill prmise to learn to speeel :)
To many IF's, do some research, instead of flaming. On 12 June 2011 12:31, adam <a...@papsy.net> wrote: > At the end of the day, you're going to be treated like a child as long as > you continue to type like one. > > The entertaining part for me is how each of your replies contradicts a > previous one. According to you, this *vulnerability* *has existed for > years*. And also according to you, the reason why the original email was > filled with spelling errors is because it *was rushed out due to you being > "awake" at 6AM.* Do you see the inconsistency between those two > statements? Your response to Christian also indicated that you* **didn'tjust > discover this > *. > > IF this is an old vulnerability and IF you've known about it for an > extended period of time - WHY did you have to post it right when you did? > It's old, you've known about it for a while, it's existed for years, yet it > couldn't wait until later in the day? It couldn't wait until you had time to > skim over the email and correct any spelling/grammar mistakes? It absolutely > had to be posted right then and there? > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:14 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- <sec...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thats why i the people who do understand it, can see that it is there... >> yes, VERY hard to expalin, id LOVE to see you try. >> >> >> >> On 12 June 2011 12:11, adam <a...@papsy.net> wrote: >> >>> Furthermore, pretending that we [the readers] are somehow at fault here >>> (for not understanding) isn't going to get you very far. The only thing >>> consistent in this entire thread is that people *kind of* want to know >>> what you're talking about, but aren't able to due to the poor writing style >>> and spelling/grammar errors. >>> >>> It should be noted that no one is being anal about typos, I fully >>> understand that people make mistakes. The difference is that it appears you >>> didn't even so much as proof read the original email. >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, phocean <0...@phocean.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi n3td3v... oops!... secn3t (that is close), >>>> >>>> Sorry but I don't understand anything to this thread. >>>> Each of your emails is such a pain to read, that I stop at the first >>>> sentence. >>>> We are all busy and don't want to take 20 min to decipher your writing >>>> with the risk that it is not deserving it. >>>> Please clarify and give consistent technical facts. >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Le 12/06/2011 03:33, -= Glowing Doom =- a écrit : >>>> > This is NOT coded.. the PoC i am explaining, is possible with simply >>>> > copyying text,then using a sequence of keys, to make the actual >>>> > sentence/s, appear. >>>> > This code is not what shows up when it is dissected. >>>> > It shows up with many x41 all over the email when it is done properly >>>> . >>>> > Regards. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On 12 June 2011 11:29, Christian Sciberras <uuf6...@gmail.com >>>> > <mailto:uuf6...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > For those lazy enough to search: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/The_CSRSS_Backspace_Bug_still_works_in_windows_2003_sp1 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Excerpt: >>>> > >>>> > Basicaly just compile this and you will get a 100% processor usage >>>> > by the compiled exploit and Csrss.exe >>>> > >>>> > #include <stdio.h> >>>> > int main(void) >>>> > { >>>> > while(1) >>>> > printf("\t\t\b\b\b\b\b\b"); >>>> > return 0; >>>> > } >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > How this helps in sending spam is beyond me. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Jeffrey Walton < >>>> noloa...@gmail.com >>>> > <mailto:noloa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:06 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- >>>> > <sec...@gmail.com <mailto:sec...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > It is now, over 1yr old atleast and exists in riched20.dll. >>>> > > This PoC info is over for me also. >>>> > Microsoft had problems with a backspace in the past. Search >>>> for >>>> > "CSRSS >>>> > Backspace Bug". >>>> > >>>> > > [SNIP >>>> > >>>> > Jeff >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>> > Charter: >>>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> phocean >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
