Here again.... I will write a sentence now, and, i will just copy, so it is 'darkened' text , then with NO backspace just leave the text darkened, and goto 'link' , and enter a link.. the text will turn to red.
(this is the easiest way to reproduce it...) <http://www.haxxor-NOT.bs> On 12 June 2011 13:07, -= Glowing Doom =- <sec...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should have said just 'copy, then hit link... because the other one, is > actually VERY hard to explain..but yes... backspace... has a bug with > emails. Is this so hard for 500000 ppl to understand ? > I am really shocked at the brubbish talk i have copped from this. > > > > On 12 June 2011 13:06, -= Glowing Doom =- <sec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Do the research... then call yourself a 'team'...please :s >> >> The PoC, is easy as hell to reproduce. I am shocked a team, cannot do it.. >> >> even the easy one wich is just copy/backspace, and, hit link and enter a >> link! >> simple ? >> >> >> >> On 12 June 2011 12:52, Haxxor Security <h...@xxor.se> wrote: >> >>> As I (painfully tried to) understand it, secn3t can fool his own email >>> client to create malformed links by pressing backspace... >>> >>> >>> 2011/6/12 adam <a...@papsy.net> >>> >>>> At the end of the day, you're going to be treated like a child as long >>>> as you continue to type like one. >>>> >>>> The entertaining part for me is how each of your replies contradicts a >>>> previous one. According to you, this *vulnerability* *has existed for >>>> years*. And also according to you, the reason why the original email >>>> was filled with spelling errors is because it *was rushed out due to >>>> you being "awake" at 6AM.* Do you see the inconsistency between those >>>> two statements? Your response to Christian also indicated that you* ** >>>> didn't just discover this*. >>>> >>>> IF this is an old vulnerability and IF you've known about it for an >>>> extended period of time - WHY did you have to post it right when you did? >>>> It's old, you've known about it for a while, it's existed for years, yet it >>>> couldn't wait until later in the day? It couldn't wait until you had time >>>> to >>>> skim over the email and correct any spelling/grammar mistakes? It >>>> absolutely >>>> had to be posted right then and there? >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:14 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- >>>> <sec...@gmail.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thats why i the people who do understand it, can see that it is >>>>> there... yes, VERY hard to expalin, id LOVE to see you try. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12 June 2011 12:11, adam <a...@papsy.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Furthermore, pretending that we [the readers] are somehow at fault >>>>>> here (for not understanding) isn't going to get you very far. The only >>>>>> thing >>>>>> consistent in this entire thread is that people *kind of* want to >>>>>> know what you're talking about, but aren't able to due to the poor >>>>>> writing >>>>>> style and spelling/grammar errors. >>>>>> >>>>>> It should be noted that no one is being anal about typos, I fully >>>>>> understand that people make mistakes. The difference is that it appears >>>>>> you >>>>>> didn't even so much as proof read the original email. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:04 PM, phocean <0...@phocean.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi n3td3v... oops!... secn3t (that is close), >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sorry but I don't understand anything to this thread. >>>>>>> Each of your emails is such a pain to read, that I stop at the first >>>>>>> sentence. >>>>>>> We are all busy and don't want to take 20 min to decipher your >>>>>>> writing >>>>>>> with the risk that it is not deserving it. >>>>>>> Please clarify and give consistent technical facts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Le 12/06/2011 03:33, -= Glowing Doom =- a écrit : >>>>>>> > This is NOT coded.. the PoC i am explaining, is possible with >>>>>>> simply >>>>>>> > copyying text,then using a sequence of keys, to make the actual >>>>>>> > sentence/s, appear. >>>>>>> > This code is not what shows up when it is dissected. >>>>>>> > It shows up with many x41 all over the email when it is done >>>>>>> properly . >>>>>>> > Regards. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On 12 June 2011 11:29, Christian Sciberras <uuf6...@gmail.com >>>>>>> > <mailto:uuf6...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > For those lazy enough to search: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://www.owasp.org/index.php/The_CSRSS_Backspace_Bug_still_works_in_windows_2003_sp1 >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Excerpt: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Basicaly just compile this and you will get a 100% processor >>>>>>> usage >>>>>>> > by the compiled exploit and Csrss.exe >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > #include <stdio.h> >>>>>>> > int main(void) >>>>>>> > { >>>>>>> > while(1) >>>>>>> > printf("\t\t\b\b\b\b\b\b"); >>>>>>> > return 0; >>>>>>> > } >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > How this helps in sending spam is beyond me. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Jeffrey Walton < >>>>>>> noloa...@gmail.com >>>>>>> > <mailto:noloa...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:06 PM, -= Glowing Doom =- >>>>>>> > <sec...@gmail.com <mailto:sec...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > It is now, over 1yr old atleast and exists in >>>>>>> riched20.dll. >>>>>>> > > This PoC info is over for me also. >>>>>>> > Microsoft had problems with a backspace in the past. Search >>>>>>> for >>>>>>> > "CSRSS >>>>>>> > Backspace Bug". >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > > [SNIP >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Jeff >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>>>>> > Charter: >>>>>>> http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>>>>> > Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>>>>> > Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> phocean >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html >>> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ >>> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/