Yes, and it you look at the real to integer, and integer to real, assignments without conversion functions, you can see where the actual assignment may be indeterminate. I don't have the datasets, and haven't done Fortran since F77, but when I did Fortran, assignment without type conversion produced unpredictable results. Specifically, in little endian machines, assigning a real to an integer was a very workable random number generator.
From: Martin Tomasek [mailto:toma...@ufe.cz] Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 4:04 PM To: Tomas L. Byrnes Cc: Drsolly; funsec; RandallM Subject: Re: [funsec] simple question Tomas L. Byrnes napsal(a): Hence we return you to my focus: the code. Code does not lie, it merely does what it was told. By my reading, the CRU code produces ever more excited random numbers. Someone else please read it and prove me wrong. Quote from docs: "Had to make some changes to allow for the move back to alphas (different field length from the 'wc -l' command)." If their code depends on calling external programs, it will be difficult to verify. Unless you are sure of actual output formats. :-) -- Martin Tomasek
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.