> -----Original Message-----
> From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org]
> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Walton
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:26 PM
> To: FunSec
> Subject: [funsec] Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social
> Security Number is Not Identity Theft
> 
> From the folks at the Dataloss Database....
> 
> The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled "that using someone else's Social
> Security number is not identity theft as long as you use your own name
> with it." ....
> 
> http://robertsiciliano.com/blog/2010/11/11/colorado-supreme-court-
> using-a-stolen-social-security-number-is-not-identity-theft/
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
[Tomas L. Byrnes] 
While I would never advocate criminality, it would be poetic justice if
the SSIDs of all the justices who voted in favor of this SSIDs were
posted on some website used to sell such data to those looking for
"clean credit".

After all, it is no big deal, according to them.


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to