On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes <t...@byrneit.net> wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org [mailto:funsec-boun...@linuxbox.org]
>> On Behalf Of Jeffrey Walton
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 6:26 PM
>> To: FunSec
>> Subject: [funsec] Colorado Supreme Court: Using a Stolen Social
>> Security Number is Not Identity Theft
>>
>> From the folks at the Dataloss Database....
>>
>> The Colorado Supreme Court has ruled "that using someone else's Social
>> Security number is not identity theft as long as you use your own name
>> with it." ....
>>
>> http://robertsiciliano.com/blog/2010/11/11/colorado-supreme-court-
>> using-a-stolen-social-security-number-is-not-identity-theft/
>>
> [Tomas L. Byrnes]
> While I would never advocate criminality, it would be poetic justice if
> the SSIDs of all the justices who voted in favor of this SSIDs were
> posted on some website used to sell such data to those looking for
> "clean credit".
Be careful with this one. I criticized a Federal Judge in similar
fashion. The US Marshals showed up at my house in an effort to
"silence through intimidation". The email is pasted below.

> After all, it is no big deal, according to them.
Haha!

Jeff

==========

[Sent to the Clerk of the Court]

Hello,

Please pass on to Judge Buckles.

Judge Buckles: I would like to thank you for your recent assassination
in Amburgy v. Express Scripts, Inc. Writing that Ambury did not
demonstrate harm that is ‘actual or imminent, not conjectural or
hypothetical' was appalling.

The fact of the matter is that the danger is real. One of the first
things those who are negligence do is offer computer and personal
security services to the victims, such as antivirus and credit
monitoring.

Your ruling is synonymous with, "There's no proof that the thief who
broke into the safe and stole the money will spend the money." I can
only hope that you and your family are the victims of a breach, so you
can endure the mythical threat upon which you base your opinions.

You are clearly not qualified to preside over issues in the digital
age. Next time, please do all of us a favor and recuse yourself.

Thanks jackass,

Jeffrey Walton
Baltimore, MD, US

[Postscript]
"After data loss, ID theft risk soars"
http://redtape.msnbc.com/2009/11/i-call-them-dear-john-data-letters-because-of-the-bad-news-they-bring-and-their-decidedly-warm-and-fuzzy-tone--dear-consume.html

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

Reply via email to